Same Host Dependencies With Servicegroups

[slansing]

The new Eric is actually looking over it, he's pretty much a rock star as well, you'll get to meet him this year! I did set this up to some extent on one of my local systems and it seemed a bit funky as well, still not sure if it was the lack of coffee or not, I'm going to go back at it in a bit here.

[eloyd]

Careful - us Erics are poised to take over the world.

[slansing]

Eric took a look last night, sounds like we *may* not be handling those dependencies correctly, he is going to look back into it when he gets a bit more time. I kinda left it at that since it sounds like it could be a small bug in the handling, I'll continue to try and get this reaction on my end but once Eric takes a longer look into it he will likely be replying here. Thank you for your patience Eric!

[eloyd]

Thanks for the update. By no means is this a show stopper. It's more like a "would be nice if it worked as logically intended."

[slansing]

Sounds good, I just wanted to poke you to let you know we didn't forget you!

[eloyd]

I feel so violated.

[abrist]

There may be a bug with this - Ludmil filed an internal bug today for dependencies only pulling the last member of any assigned groups . . . .

[eloyd]

Gee, that sounds...familiar.

[lmiltchev]

If you want to follow up on the internal bug report I filed, it's TASK ID=3948. I doubt our devs will get to it before the conference though.

[eloyd]

It's not a show-stopper. I'll find Eric at the conference.