Finally, what is the conclusion?
I saw that there are some acknowledging from this "feature".
Is this a bug?
Search found 4 matches
- Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:02 am
- Forum: Open Source Nagios Projects
- Topic: check_ping 2.2.1 bug?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4025
- Mon Nov 04, 2019 4:41 am
- Forum: Open Source Nagios Projects
- Topic: check_ping 2.2.1 bug?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4025
Re: check_ping 2.2.1 bug?
You don't reproduce it because the google is reachable! :) Test it again with unreachable host. Granted I don't have access to the 2.1.4 RPM from EPEL, I'm not able to reproduce this using a separate 2.1.4 build against 2.2.1 in EPEL: # rpm -i nagios-plugins-2.1.4-3.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm warning: na...
- Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:58 am
- Forum: Open Source Nagios Projects
- Topic: check_ping 2.2.1 bug?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4025
Re: check_ping 2.2.1 bug?
It's so weird! At the first I installed it with yum! yum install nagios-plugins-all -y After downloaded the plugins from http://nagios-plugins.org/download/ , and untar, compile it. Finally I replaced the original check_ping file to the new command file. With check_ping -V command was checked the ac...
- Mon Oct 28, 2019 6:58 am
- Forum: Open Source Nagios Projects
- Topic: check_ping 2.2.1 bug?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4025
check_ping 2.2.1 bug?
Hi! In version of check_ping 2.2.1 I tried modify these parameters lot of versions ("-w 100,5% -c 200,15% -4 -p 5 -t 30") when the target host is denied any ICMP packet by iptables, but haven't got performance data in response, except with "-p 1" parameter. The answer was only: C...