Nagios Support Forum

News! Good and "bad" I managed to get the receiving server upgraded to the same version. and now all the checks are appearing in unconfigured objects, woohoo!. But when I add and try to apply them I'm getting pre-check failure for items that don't actually exist on the nagios instance. Err...

Scott,

All good, I know what that's like.

I will see if I can get the main instance updated. Obviously being the main system they get a bit antsy about it.

APologies for my delayed response, Was out sick for a few days.

That was in my initial post

"We have a central nagiosXI install running(5.5.8) And a remote NagiosXI(5.6.10) running."

[root@localhost ~]# tail /usr/local/nagiosxi/var/perfdataproc.log -f Processing perfdata file '/usr/local/nagios/var/spool/xidpe/1581457061.perfdata.service' Sending passive check data to NRDP server(s)... Sending to NRDP target host: monitor.c1.net.au CMDLINE: cat /tmp/NRDPOUTdQfcNx | /usr/local/nr...

I'm not seeing anything about outboundchecks. On a hunch I forced a host check as below. [root@localhost ~]# tail /usr/local/nagiosxi/var/cmdsubsys.log -f PROCESSED 0 COMMANDS ........................................................... PROCESSED 0 COMMANDS ..............................................

Yes the sending server is online and actively checking.

I've attached a screenshot showing that checks were performed only a few minutes ago.

I see a "somehost" in the unconfigured objects on the receiving server

However the sending NAgiosXI instance has 120 differnet hosts configured, none with that name.

Hi Scott,

As there is still no objects coming through in unconfigured I don't think we can.

All I know is that the sender is correctly comm'ing tot he receiver, but nothing is showing up still.

The commands to directly check from sender were both sitting there doing nothing. But it did reveal that even though I had put an IP address directly into the sender config, that it was then trying to use a FQDN for the post command, and that it was resolving the external address and not the interna...

Apologies for both the slow response and the mistake. See below for the output again. [root@localhost ~]# nmap <IP Suppressed> -Pn -p 443 Starting Nmap 6.47 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2020-02-07 14:17 AEST Nmap scan report for <IP Suppressed> Host is up (0.0058s latency). PORT STATE SERVICE 443/tcp open...