Search found 38 matches

by lveitch
Mon Jan 26, 2026 5:48 pm
Forum: Nagios XI
Topic: NCPA repeating error in syslog?
Replies: 8
Views: 20973

Re: NCPA repeating error in syslog?

I was just curious to see if this was addressed or not. I have not implemented any fix attempts or anything since noticing this issue a few months back and just wanted to ask if this got fixed
by lveitch
Thu Sep 25, 2025 10:15 am
Forum: Nagios XI
Topic: NCPA repeating error in syslog?
Replies: 8
Views: 20973

Re: NCPA repeating error in syslog?

You might try doing a search of the internet for the first line. ncpa[4877]: Exception ignored in: <function _after_fork at 0x763105c0d080> I tried that but nothing came up that was of any use There is a discussion about it here https://support.nagios.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=76492 I wonder why th...
by lveitch
Tue Sep 23, 2025 3:11 pm
Forum: Nagios XI
Topic: NCPA repeating error in syslog?
Replies: 8
Views: 20973

NCPA repeating error in syslog?

Hey everyone, I didn't know where else to ask this but I am running the NCPA agent on a Ubuntu Server 24 that is sending syslog data to NagiosXI but I noticed all of this data in my syslog repeating and I have no clue what to make of it. Can anyone tell me what might be the issue? 2025-09-23T20:04:2...
by lveitch
Fri Sep 12, 2025 3:06 pm
Forum: Open Source Nagios Projects
Topic: debian repo.nagios.com signature issue
Replies: 15
Views: 129206

Re: debian repo.nagios.com signature issue

That surprisingly worked. I had redid the key previously but apparently something didn't take and doing it again it worked. Appreciate it
by lveitch
Tue Sep 09, 2025 12:59 pm
Forum: Open Source Nagios Projects
Topic: debian repo.nagios.com signature issue
Replies: 15
Views: 129206

Re: debian repo.nagios.com signature issue

Is this still an issue that hasnt been resolved as of yet? Last I saw was the June post about it but was curious if I needed to do something or if its still going on

Image
upload pic
by lveitch
Fri Apr 18, 2025 12:30 pm
Forum: Nagios XI
Topic: NagiosXI and Tenable - TLS1.0 Question
Replies: 6
Views: 7245

Re: NagiosXI and Tenable - TLS1.0 Question

Okay I got it...so my new Tenable scan came back with port 25 (SMTP). Even though I never explicitly installed it or set it up, its a part of the NagiosXI install for Ubuntu. It installs postfix by default. I found it by checking my services service --status-all and I saw postfix was running. I then...
by lveitch
Fri Apr 18, 2025 11:50 am
Forum: Nagios XI
Topic: NagiosXI and Tenable - TLS1.0 Question
Replies: 6
Views: 7245

Re: NagiosXI and Tenable - TLS1.0 Question

Sorry for my super late response; other things came up and I had to put this on the back burner. I will give that a try and re-run my Tenable scan and see if that does the trick. I will respond with and update once everything is done
by lveitch
Wed Apr 02, 2025 10:32 am
Forum: Nagios XI
Topic: NagiosXI and Tenable - TLS1.0 Question
Replies: 6
Views: 7245

Re: NagiosXI and Tenable - TLS1.0 Question

From everything I have read and found, everything looks fine. Just not sure what exactly I am missing. I have tried probably 50 permutations of the settings in the SSL file with no luck.
by lveitch
Mon Mar 31, 2025 2:13 pm
Forum: Nagios XI
Topic: GUI not writing to config files?
Replies: 7
Views: 3341

Re: GUI not writing to config files?

Dave, Yeah its still an issue. I just found it easier to delete the config file and re-create it like its new so everything works and is good but I know thats not feasible in all scenarios. We have the same issue. It shows it updated and everything looks good, even the file has the updated date on i...
by lveitch
Mon Mar 31, 2025 10:26 am
Forum: Nagios XI
Topic: NagiosXI and Tenable - TLS1.0 Question
Replies: 6
Views: 7245

Re: NagiosXI and Tenable - TLS1.0 Question

Sure can # Pseudo Random Number Generator (PRNG): # Configure one or more sources to seed the PRNG of the SSL library. # The seed data should be of good random quality. # WARNING! On some platforms /dev/random blocks if not enough entropy # is available. This means you then cannot use the /dev/rando...