Thanks for all answers.
I got one another, is check_multi plugin correct to achive i described or i should strongly use BPI?
Because i've found BPI complex and looks like check_multi is more sophisticated.
Search found 4 matches
- Tue Jan 13, 2015 4:01 am
- Forum: Open Source Nagios Projects
- Topic: False positives avoidance
- Replies: 22
- Views: 18496
- Fri Jan 09, 2015 2:02 pm
- Forum: Open Source Nagios Projects
- Topic: False positives avoidance
- Replies: 22
- Views: 18496
Re: False positives avoidance
Well i set out on one Nagios server instance. So i assmue that BPI is the solution that will suit well. It's still a little complicated to me. I'd be glad if someone can make a short description on what and where i should install, because i'm even lost in planning this solution. Thanks for your comm...
- Thu Jan 08, 2015 1:29 pm
- Forum: Open Source Nagios Projects
- Topic: False positives avoidance
- Replies: 22
- Views: 18496
Re: False positives avoidance
Thank you for response. BPI seems to be not the solution that i'm looking for. Let me be more clear what i want: The main idea is to have checks from different locations (3 locations) just in case of false positives when connection somwhere is broken. I want to agregate data in one place and iterpre...
- Sat Dec 27, 2014 11:47 am
- Forum: Open Source Nagios Projects
- Topic: False positives avoidance
- Replies: 22
- Views: 18496
False positives avoidance
I'm searching for solution that might omit false positives. I was given 3 servers and installed Nagios Core on each of them. Each server monitors ONE client and what i want to achive is to be notificated this way: 1. When one server notifes problems nothing happens 2. When 2 of 3 servers notifes pro...