Search found 21 matches
- Sat Apr 09, 2016 8:09 am
- Forum: Open Source Nagios Projects
- Topic: Suggestions for Dashboarding
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1131
Suggestions for Dashboarding
Hi everyone, What I need to achieve: Various Nagios pages such as tactical overview available on a TV in our office which cycles every 15 seconds (among other pages) in our page viewer. The problem: Authentication. Every time we close and open Chromium (this is running on a Raspberry Pi) we have to ...
- Thu Oct 08, 2015 4:09 pm
- Forum: Open Source Nagios Projects
- Topic: Nagios showing double memory usage
- Replies: 3
- Views: 971
Re: Nagios showing double memory usage
It's on the latest version of CentOS. This was fixed on one server by NSClient++ being updated, but this was not the case for the remaining server.
- Thu Oct 08, 2015 6:24 am
- Forum: Open Source Nagios Projects
- Topic: Nagios showing double memory usage
- Replies: 3
- Views: 971
Nagios showing double memory usage
Hi guys,
We're using 4.1.0 and after a CentOS update, we have some servers that are displaying double the amount of memory using check_nt commands?
Is this a known issue? I've read around and it looks like it could be a check_nt thing and that we should be using check_nrpe now?
Thanks,
Ross
We're using 4.1.0 and after a CentOS update, we have some servers that are displaying double the amount of memory using check_nt commands?
Is this a known issue? I've read around and it looks like it could be a check_nt thing and that we should be using check_nrpe now?
Thanks,
Ross
- Wed Aug 19, 2015 12:23 pm
- Forum: Open Source Nagios Projects
- Topic: Changing default_statusmap_layout= in 4.1.0
- Replies: 2
- Views: 725
Re: Changing default_statusmap_layout= in 4.1.0
I love you. Thank you!!
This can be closed!
This can be closed!
- Wed Aug 19, 2015 6:29 am
- Forum: Open Source Nagios Projects
- Topic: Changing default_statusmap_layout= in 4.1.0
- Replies: 2
- Views: 725
Changing default_statusmap_layout= in 4.1.0
Hi guys,
We have a ticker which cycles through Nagios on a TV at work and we'd like to show the new 'collapsed tree vertical' map view when we click on the map link as default. However default_statusmap_layout= in cgi.cfg doesn't change anything?
Any ideas?
Ross
We have a ticker which cycles through Nagios on a TV at work and we'd like to show the new 'collapsed tree vertical' map view when we click on the map link as default. However default_statusmap_layout= in cgi.cfg doesn't change anything?
Any ideas?
Ross
- Wed Aug 19, 2015 6:23 am
- Forum: Open Source Nagios Projects
- Topic: Map missing in Core Release Candidate
- Replies: 2
- Views: 698
Re: Map missing in Core Release Candidate
This can be closed as I'm going to update to the new stable release.
- Sat Aug 15, 2015 1:50 pm
- Forum: Open Source Nagios Projects
- Topic: Map missing in Core Release Candidate
- Replies: 2
- Views: 698
Map missing in Core Release Candidate
Hi guys,
I've just installed the 4.1.0rc2 RC hoping to see the glorious new map, but the only map I can see is the legacy option?
Any ideas?
Also, if there is a BETA or RC forum this should be in, please feel free to move it.
Thanks in advance,
Ross
I've just installed the 4.1.0rc2 RC hoping to see the glorious new map, but the only map I can see is the legacy option?
Any ideas?
Also, if there is a BETA or RC forum this should be in, please feel free to move it.
Thanks in advance,
Ross
- Thu Mar 05, 2015 4:28 pm
- Forum: Open Source Nagios Projects
- Topic: Notifications
- Replies: 28
- Views: 8458
Re: Notifications
I can't believe I didn't see this sooner. The debug log answers all... service_notification_options w,u,c,r,f,s,n Remove the ",n" from the end of that line in contacts.cfg then reload Nagios. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH! YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS! THANK YOU! (What does the n stand for?!)
- Wed Mar 04, 2015 6:52 pm
- Forum: Open Source Nagios Projects
- Topic: Notifications
- Replies: 28
- Views: 8458
Re: Notifications
Sent!
- Wed Mar 04, 2015 5:54 pm
- Forum: Open Source Nagios Projects
- Topic: Notifications
- Replies: 28
- Views: 8458
Re: Notifications
Sent!