Search found 329 matches
- Thu Jan 04, 2018 4:05 am
- Forum: Open Source Nagios Projects
- Topic: check_nrpe to detect if process/service is/is not running
- Replies: 7
- Views: 12071
Re: check_nrpe to detect if process/service is/is not runnin
Yes, the thread can be closed, thank you.
- Wed Jan 03, 2018 11:25 am
- Forum: Open Source Nagios Projects
- Topic: check_nrpe to detect if process/service is/is not running
- Replies: 7
- Views: 12071
Re: check_nrpe to detect if process/service is/is not runnin
I just realised that I hadn't included -a in my command definitions - adding that in and restarting Nagios makes things work fine!
Thanks very much for the hint about the differences between different versions of NSClient++ - that's what got me sorted!
Pete
Thanks very much for the hint about the differences between different versions of NSClient++ - that's what got me sorted!
Pete
- Wed Jan 03, 2018 10:55 am
- Forum: Open Source Nagios Projects
- Topic: check_nrpe to detect if process/service is/is not running
- Replies: 7
- Views: 12071
Re: check_nrpe to detect if process/service is/is not runnin
Thanks for coming back to me! It's 0.4.3.143 Adding -a returns the following: ./check_nrpe -H 99.99.99.99 check_service -a service=nscp I (0.4.3.143 2015-04-29) seem to be doing fine... ./check_nrpe -H 99.99.99.99 check_service -a service=W3svc I (0.4.3.143 2015-04-29) seem to be doing fine... so ag...
- Wed Jan 03, 2018 8:38 am
- Forum: Open Source Nagios Projects
- Topic: check_nrpe to detect if process/service is/is not running
- Replies: 7
- Views: 12071
check_nrpe to detect if process/service is/is not running
Good afternoon, I have defined the following 4 commands: #Alert if Explorer.exe PROCESS is NOT running on WINDOWS hosts using check_nrpe define command{ command_name check_nrpe_explorer_off command_line $USER1$/check_nrpe -H $HOSTADDRESS$ -p 5666 -c check_process process=explorer.exe "crit=stat...
- Thu Dec 21, 2017 9:59 am
- Forum: Open Source Nagios Projects
- Topic: check_interval minimum value
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2336
Re: check_interval minimum value
I've just come back to this and it answers my question, so the thread can be closed. Thank you!
- Thu Dec 21, 2017 9:23 am
- Forum: Open Source Nagios Projects
- Topic: Changing Forum Username
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1134
Re: Changing Forum Username
This thread can now be closed - thank you!
- Thu Dec 14, 2017 4:15 am
- Forum: Open Source Nagios Projects
- Topic: Socket Timeouts
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1369
Re: Socket Timeouts
Thanks for your reply! So that means then that if I want to increase the value to 120, I'm going to have to do it in NSClient++.ini on all my 1014 remote hosts and make sure that there are no -t values defined in my services?
Pete
Pete
- Wed Dec 13, 2017 11:44 am
- Forum: Open Source Nagios Projects
- Topic: Disk Latency PerfMon Query
- Replies: 1
- Views: 990
Disk Latency PerfMon Query
Good afternoon, I'm using variations on the following to report disk drive latency via PerfMon define service{ use generic-service host_name hostgroup_name service_description C_Disk_Write_Latency check_command check_nrpe!checkcounter! -a 'Counter:C: Avg. Disk sec/Write=\LogicalDisk(C:)\Avg. Disk se...
- Wed Dec 13, 2017 7:43 am
- Forum: Open Source Nagios Projects
- Topic: Socket Timeouts
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1369
Socket Timeouts
Good afternoon, I'm currently receiving email alerts for various services that relate to socket timeouts. Notification Type: PROBLEM Service: Win_Drive_Space_E Host: Address: State: CRITICAL Date/Time: Tue Dec 12 21:36:44 GMT 2017 Additional Info: CRITICAL - Socket timeout I believe that I can add a...
- Wed Dec 13, 2017 7:38 am
- Forum: Open Source Nagios Projects
- Topic: Disk Latency Monitoring using PerfMon
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3316
Re: Disk Latency Monitoring using PerfMon
What I HAVE noticed is when I set it to 1, the Nagios restart is WAY quicker than when it's at 0.25 (10-15 seconds, as against over a minute) which suggests that there's something it doesn't like, even though it verifies with no errors. Anyhow, thanks for your confirmation that decimal values aren't...