Ultimately, you are going to have to make a judgment call with your setup. We test, but we can't possibly test with every setup out there. The only metric I can give you is that there are not yet any bugs reported against that feature: https://github.com/NagiosEnterprises/na ... pen%20autotermcap wrote:Considering auto_scheduler is an experimental feature, is it ok if I keep it on for a production box ?
As far as using an offloader, if you are having performance issues, that's probably the next place to go. With ours coming out though, maybe you should wait? Again, that's really a judgment call on your part. I wish I had a date to tell people on when that will be out.
If you want my opinion, with the caveat that I don't know how much pain 4.1.1 is causing you, I'd run 4.2.4 in a test box for a week with auto_scheduler turned on and see if I run into issues. If I had reason to be more paranoid, I'd give it two weeks. Of course, you might not have that much time.
We can always leave this open and see if anyone in the community is using auto_scheduler.
Also, you could always start a thread that specifically asks about opinions on auto_scheduler. I don't know how many people are going to come to a thread on high load to give an opinion on auto_scheduler, but we certainly have community members that contribute on the forums.