Yes , tcpdump is receiving traffic on port 9917.
Because the port is not listening anymore due to continuous crashing of sfcapd processes the source can't collect any traffic.
Our server address ap-dco101-ias.bel.centric.lan is in fact a duplicate name in our dns records. We need to correct this.
It is still not clear why process stops frequently.
[root@AP-DCO163-NA flows]# ll
total 5268
-rw-r--r--+ 1 nna nnacmd 286459 Feb 16 09:50 nfcapd.201502160945
-rw-r--r--+ 1 nna nnacmd 292273 Feb 16 09:55 nfcapd.201502160950
-rw-r--r--+ 1 nna nnacmd 300371 Feb 16 10:00 nfcapd.201502160955
-rw-r--r--+ 1 nna nnacmd 366195 Feb 16 10:05 nfcapd.201502161000
-rw-r--r--+ 1 nna nnacmd 387092 Feb 16 10:10 nfcapd.201502161005
-rw-r--r--+ 1 nna nnacmd 289785 Feb 16 10:15 nfcapd.201502161010
-rw-r--r--+ 1 nna nnacmd 418950 Feb 16 10:20 nfcapd.201502161015
-rw-r--r--+ 1 nna nnacmd 394514 Feb 16 10:25 nfcapd.201502161020
-rw-r--r--+ 1 nna nnacmd 361279 Feb 16 10:30 nfcapd.201502161025
-rw-r--r--+ 1 nna nnacmd 349665 Feb 16 10:35 nfcapd.201502161030
-rw-r--r--+ 1 nna nnacmd 330966 Feb 16 10:40 nfcapd.201502161035
-rw-r--r--+ 1 nna nnacmd 302311 Feb 16 10:45 nfcapd.201502161040
-rw-r--r--+ 1 nna nnacmd 339341 Feb 16 10:50 nfcapd.201502161045
-rw-r--r--+ 1 nna nnacmd 310655 Feb 16 10:55 nfcapd.201502161050
-rw-r--r--+ 1 nna nnacmd 298446 Feb 16 11:00 nfcapd.201502161055
-rw-r--r--+ 1 nna nnacmd 332318 Feb 16 11:05 nfcapd.201502161100
-rw-r--r--+ 1 nna nnacmd 276 Feb 16 11:05 nfcapd.current.17746
I did check and sfcapd has another thread that described a similar general protection fault. It mentions sfcapd failing when attempting to reuse the same port.
from this post:
The odd thing now is that I can start on a different port with dgb running, and it will load with minimal options. If I close the program, and re-run it on the same port, I get the crash.
General protection faults are difficult to determine the cause of, and are sometimes hardware related errors, especially if they are intermittent. Does your NNA server run on a dedicated box, or is this shared on a VM server? Can you run a physical memory check against the server? (memtest86+)
Another thing I found that could cause it is running out of memory. Could you add more to the server and try setting up the source again and see if it works for you?
Be sure to check out our Knowledgebase for helpful articles and solutions!