SNMP troubles after 5R1.0 upgrade
Re: SNMP troubles after 5R1.0 upgrade
After few week of usage I noticed that snmpwalk via GUI (apache) works from time to time even with 60-70 hosts (by now in our development) under monitoring.
Or it fails on the first attempt ("Next" to the 2nd scree), but works after "Back" and "Next" done once again.
Clearly something is not ideal, nor it is completely broken. Might be attributed to our highly virtualized environment.
Hope to see this addressed in future patches.
Or it fails on the first attempt ("Next" to the 2nd scree), but works after "Back" and "Next" done once again.
Clearly something is not ideal, nor it is completely broken. Might be attributed to our highly virtualized environment.
Hope to see this addressed in future patches.
Re: SNMP troubles after 5R1.0 upgrade
I've reached out to the developer who wrote that functionality, we'll see what he says.
60-70 hosts is a fairly small environment (depending on the number of service checks) so it shouldn't really affect that wizard.
What does your load look like?
60-70 hosts is a fairly small environment (depending on the number of service checks) so it shouldn't really affect that wizard.
What does your load look like?
Code: Select all
uptime
topRe: SNMP troubles after 5R1.0 upgrade
Also, edit your /etc/php.ini and increase your memory_limit:
Then restart HTTPD and try it again:
Code: Select all
memory_limit = 256MCode: Select all
service httpd restartRe: SNMP troubles after 5R1.0 upgrade
ssax wrote:I've reached out to the developer who wrote that functionality, we'll see what he says.
60-70 hosts is a fairly small environment (depending on the number of service checks) so it shouldn't really affect that wizard.
What does your load look like?
Code: Select all
uptime top
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: SNMP troubles after 5R1.0 upgrade
Did you adjust the php memory_limit from the post after?
Re: SNMP troubles after 5R1.0 upgrade
Yes I doubled it (and could probably quadruple later on if required)ssax wrote:Did you adjust the php memory_limit from the post after?
- please let me run snmpwalks for a week and let you know if there was a definite improvement
Re: SNMP troubles after 5R1.0 upgrade
For very remote snmpwalks this still fails, but for local ones things workhsmith wrote:Let us know.
Thanks!
I wonder if this has to be doubled again (?)
Re: SNMP troubles after 5R1.0 upgrade
What is the output of these commands:
Try running them multiple times to see if it fails as well.
Now let's check the size:
Code: Select all
snmpwalk -v 2c -c COMMUNITY X.X.X.X:161 .1.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.3
snmpwalk -v 2c -c COMMUNITY X.X.X.X:161 .1.3.6.1.4.1.77.1.2.3.1.1
snmpwalk -v 2c -c COMMUNITY X.X.X.X:161 .1.3.6.1.2.1.25.4.2.1.2Now let's check the size:
Code: Select all
snmpwalk -v 2c -c COMMUNITY X.X.X.X:161 .1.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.3 > /tmp/snmp_output_1.txt
snmpwalk -v 2c -c COMMUNITY X.X.X.X:161 .1.3.6.1.4.1.77.1.2.3.1.1 > /tmp/snmp_output_2.txt
snmpwalk -v 2c -c COMMUNITY X.X.X.X:161 .1.3.6.1.2.1.25.4.2.1.2 /tmp/snmp_output_3.txt
ls -l /tmp/snmp_output*
Re: SNMP troubles after 5R1.0 upgrade
[root@fikc-nagxiprod01 ~]# ls -l /tmp/snmp_output*ssax wrote:What is the output of these commands:
- did not fail against two very remote SNMPWALKs (except that 2nd command returns no object)Code: Select all
snmpwalk -v 2c -c COMMUNITY X.X.X.X:161 .1.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.3 snmpwalk -v 2c -c COMMUNITY X.X.X.X:161 .1.3.6.1.4.1.77.1.2.3.1.1 snmpwalk -v 2c -c COMMUNITY X.X.X.X:161 .1.3.6.1.2.1.25.4.2.1.2
Try running them multiple times to see if it fails as well.
Now let's check the size:
Code: Select all
snmpwalk -v 2c -c COMMUNITY X.X.X.X:161 .1.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.3 > /tmp/snmp_output_1.txt snmpwalk -v 2c -c COMMUNITY X.X.X.X:161 .1.3.6.1.4.1.77.1.2.3.1.1 > /tmp/snmp_output_2.txt snmpwalk -v 2c -c COMMUNITY X.X.X.X:161 .1.3.6.1.2.1.25.4.2.1.2 /tmp/snmp_output_3.txt ls -l /tmp/snmp_output*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 875 Nov 11 17:10 /tmp/snmp_output_1.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 90 Nov 11 17:11 /tmp/snmp_output_2.txt
[root@fikc-nagxiprod01 ~]#
#3 not created.