Re: Wireless Clients
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2016 8:19 am
Yes it is. I disabled snmp on both controllers and i re-enabled and still the same output.
Support for Nagios products and services
https://support.nagios.com/forum/
Can you run nmap 192.168.110.1 and post the full output? If SNMP walk isn't working then the plugin surely won't either.orani wrote:Both of snmpwalk gives me timeout: no response from 192.168.110.1
Code: Select all
# nmap 192.168.110.1
Starting Nmap 5.51 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2016-06-21 19:51 EEST
Nmap scan report for 192.168.110.1
Host is up (0.0043s latency).
Not shown: 985 closed ports
PORT STATE SERVICE
20/tcp filtered ftp-data
21/tcp filtered ftp
22/tcp open ssh
53/tcp open domain
80/tcp open http
161/tcp filtered snmp
443/tcp open https
1056/tcp filtered vfo
2001/tcp filtered dc
5432/tcp open postgresql
8080/tcp open http-proxy
8081/tcp open blackice-icecap
8082/tcp open blackice-alerts
8090/tcp open unknown
8093/tcp open unknown
Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 1.61 seconds
Code: Select all
161/tcp filtered snmp
Code: Select all
nmap -sU -p161 192.168.110.1Code: Select all
# nmap -sU -p161 192.168.110.1
Starting Nmap 5.51 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2016-06-23 02:46 EEST
Nmap scan report for 192.168.110.1
Host is up (0.0017s latency).
PORT STATE SERVICE
161/udp open|filtered snmp
Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.43 seconds
Code: Select all
Starting Nmap 6.47 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2016-06-23 10:21 AEST
Nmap scan report for centos01 (10.25.13.10)
Host is up (0.00038s latency).
rDNS record for 10.25.13.10: centos01.box293.local
PORT STATE SERVICE
161/udp open snmp
MAC Address: 00:50:56:AB:89:1C (VMware)
Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.15 seconds