Re: [Nagios-devel] linking issues
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 5:00 am
--OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
hey,
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 09:16:00AM +0200, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> >i believe there's an autoconf macro that can determine whether or not
> >the libraries are necessary.
>=20
> Nah. autoconf only determines if libraries are necessary for certain=20
> functions. For nagios, -lnsl isn't required on Linux. To the best of my=
=20
right. so check if they're necessary for a couple functions that
typically need it
> knowledge it isn't required on *BSD either, but I'm not certain. What I=
=20
> was curious about was on which platforms it is actually required, or if=
=20
> it could be dropped entirely (as I believe).
i assumed it would be necessary for solaris, but i just fired off
a build that ran successfully without it, so maybe it can just be
removed. i guess the worst case scenario is that it gets taken out
and someone send a mail to nagios-devel saying that we need it
after all...
sean
--OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCkdPGynjLPm522B0RAidNAKCJ52ohwfGxACCOs/7OQ+qd2X0Z4QCghzVb
5zBTMD33bP8dVcIGGak/SmI=
=p57C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG--
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
hey,
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 09:16:00AM +0200, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> >i believe there's an autoconf macro that can determine whether or not
> >the libraries are necessary.
>=20
> Nah. autoconf only determines if libraries are necessary for certain=20
> functions. For nagios, -lnsl isn't required on Linux. To the best of my=
=20
right. so check if they're necessary for a couple functions that
typically need it
> knowledge it isn't required on *BSD either, but I'm not certain. What I=
=20
> was curious about was on which platforms it is actually required, or if=
=20
> it could be dropped entirely (as I believe).
i assumed it would be necessary for solaris, but i just fired off
a build that ran successfully without it, so maybe it can just be
removed. i guess the worst case scenario is that it gets taken out
and someone send a mail to nagios-devel saying that we need it
after all...
sean
--OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCkdPGynjLPm522B0RAidNAKCJ52ohwfGxACCOs/7OQ+qd2X0Z4QCghzVb
5zBTMD33bP8dVcIGGak/SmI=
=p57C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG--
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]