Re: [Nagios-devel] NSCA bottleneck / NSCA Timestamp
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:09 am
Hi Ton,
> Not had time to blog about the change though
We should document this way on nagioscommunity instead. And you're the
native english speaker, so ...
> I think send_nsca was originally seen to be invoked at every result
> (via ocsp), so appending the timestamp itself was probably easier at
> the C program.
I do not expect much work for this change, too.
> I'm guessing the change would just involve a new flag to send_nsca to
> expect a timestamp from the input so (for example) the first field is
> the timestamp to use.
Yes, what about a "-t" option for send_nsca and the nsca daemon.
> There maybe repercussions with this, for instance, with freshness
> checking, but I think overall it is a good move. I'll be happy to help
> out with any testing.
Thank you. When finished I will mail my patch to this list.
Gerd
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]
> Not had time to blog about the change though
We should document this way on nagioscommunity instead. And you're the
native english speaker, so ...
> I think send_nsca was originally seen to be invoked at every result
> (via ocsp), so appending the timestamp itself was probably easier at
> the C program.
I do not expect much work for this change, too.
> I'm guessing the change would just involve a new flag to send_nsca to
> expect a timestamp from the input so (for example) the first field is
> the timestamp to use.
Yes, what about a "-t" option for send_nsca and the nsca daemon.
> There maybe repercussions with this, for instance, with freshness
> checking, but I think overall it is a good move. I'll be happy to help
> out with any testing.
Thank you. When finished I will mail my patch to this list.
Gerd
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]