Re: [Nagios-devel] Bug in Performance Data
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 12:20 am
Are there any message in the Nagios log file that relate to detected
time changes?
The (stated) execution time for these checks is approx 542 days, which
is strange. Most time issues would show just a few hours offset, not
almost 2 years time.
What times are reflected in the status.dat file? Are you sure your CGI
script is reading/processing the correct values from that file?
- Ethan Galstad
Lawrence Findley wrote:
> Hello Folks,
> This info is from a cgi script that we use to show execution times.
> These are obviously incorrect. None of the checks actually take more
> than a few seconds to complete.
> Any ideas? Thank you.
> -Larry Findley
>
>
>
>
> Wed Aug 4 17:00:01 PDT 2010
>
>
> Top 10 Service Check Execution Times
>
> HOST SERVICE TIME
> im477 check_rdf_content 46912687.968
> vividpics104 check_lab_min_procs 46912684.576
> vividpics158b check-win-mem 46912683.695
> vividpics110e check-win-cpu 46912683.695
> grf133 check_all_local_disk 46912683.695
> vividpics147c check-win-mem 46912683.695
> vividpics162e check-win-disk 46912683.695
> vividpics156d check-win-disk 46912683.576
> vividpics144e check-win-disk 46912683.576
> vividpics165b check-win-mem 46912683.576
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Lawrence Findley
> *To:* Nagios Developers List
> *Sent:* Wed, August 4, 2010 4:35:20 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [Nagios-devel] Bug in Performance Data
>
> Yes, Benny,
> we run ntp to keep everything correct.
> We use 4 satellites with DNX and I also verified that the time is
> correct on all of the satellites too.
>
> Wed Aug 4 16:26:13 PDT 2010
> nagios@nagios06 /usr/local/nagios/etc/objects $
> The Nagios server is not a VM.
>
> Thank you for taking a look at this!
> -Larry Findley
>
> Shutterfly
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* C. Bensend
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Sent:* Wed, August 4, 2010 12:15:27 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [Nagios-devel] Bug in Performance Data
>
>
> Is the time synced properly on your Nagios host?
>
> Is this a VM?
>
> Benny
>
>
> > I found a bug where the performance stats do not reflect execution times
> > accurately.
> >
> > version 3.2.1 shows execution times to be millions of seconds.
> > Any ideas?
> > Thank you.
> > -Larry Findley
> >
> > Monitoring Performance
> > Service Check Execution Time: 0.00 / 46912714.32 / 30610220.908 sec
> > Service Check Latency: 0.00 / 3.40 / 0.242 sec
> > Host Check Execution Time: 0.01 / 8.02 / 1.077 sec
> > Host Check Latency: 0.00 / 1.13 / 0.403 sec
> > # Active Host / Service Checks: 2159 / 18342
> > # Passive Host / Service Checks: 0 / 0
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Lawrence Findley >
> > To: Nagios Developers List >
> > Sent: Tue, August 3, 2010 12:42:12 PM
> > Subject: [Nagios-devel] 1.5 year execution time?
> >
> >
> > Here is the text:
> >
> >
> > Monitoring Performance
> > Service Check Execution Time: 0.00 / 46912714.32 / 30610220.908 sec
> > Service Check Latency: 0.00 / 3.40 / 0.242 sec
> > Host Check Execution Time: 0.01 / 8.02 / 1.077 sec
> > Host Check Latency: 0.00 / 1.13 / 0.403 sec
> > # Active Host / Service Checks: 2159 / 18342
> > # Passive Host / Service Checks: 0 / 0
> > I have tried removing status.dat and retention files. Within a few
> > minutes, it
> > goes back to these numbers.
> >
> > Anyone with idea?
> > Thank you.
> > -Larry Findley
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the
> > Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share
> > of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details:
> >
> http://p.sf.net/sf
...[email truncated]...
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]
time changes?
The (stated) execution time for these checks is approx 542 days, which
is strange. Most time issues would show just a few hours offset, not
almost 2 years time.
What times are reflected in the status.dat file? Are you sure your CGI
script is reading/processing the correct values from that file?
- Ethan Galstad
Lawrence Findley wrote:
> Hello Folks,
> This info is from a cgi script that we use to show execution times.
> These are obviously incorrect. None of the checks actually take more
> than a few seconds to complete.
> Any ideas? Thank you.
> -Larry Findley
>
>
>
>
> Wed Aug 4 17:00:01 PDT 2010
>
>
> Top 10 Service Check Execution Times
>
> HOST SERVICE TIME
> im477 check_rdf_content 46912687.968
> vividpics104 check_lab_min_procs 46912684.576
> vividpics158b check-win-mem 46912683.695
> vividpics110e check-win-cpu 46912683.695
> grf133 check_all_local_disk 46912683.695
> vividpics147c check-win-mem 46912683.695
> vividpics162e check-win-disk 46912683.695
> vividpics156d check-win-disk 46912683.576
> vividpics144e check-win-disk 46912683.576
> vividpics165b check-win-mem 46912683.576
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Lawrence Findley
> *To:* Nagios Developers List
> *Sent:* Wed, August 4, 2010 4:35:20 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [Nagios-devel] Bug in Performance Data
>
> Yes, Benny,
> we run ntp to keep everything correct.
> We use 4 satellites with DNX and I also verified that the time is
> correct on all of the satellites too.
>
> Wed Aug 4 16:26:13 PDT 2010
> nagios@nagios06 /usr/local/nagios/etc/objects $
> The Nagios server is not a VM.
>
> Thank you for taking a look at this!
> -Larry Findley
>
> Shutterfly
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* C. Bensend
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Sent:* Wed, August 4, 2010 12:15:27 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [Nagios-devel] Bug in Performance Data
>
>
> Is the time synced properly on your Nagios host?
>
> Is this a VM?
>
> Benny
>
>
> > I found a bug where the performance stats do not reflect execution times
> > accurately.
> >
> > version 3.2.1 shows execution times to be millions of seconds.
> > Any ideas?
> > Thank you.
> > -Larry Findley
> >
> > Monitoring Performance
> > Service Check Execution Time: 0.00 / 46912714.32 / 30610220.908 sec
> > Service Check Latency: 0.00 / 3.40 / 0.242 sec
> > Host Check Execution Time: 0.01 / 8.02 / 1.077 sec
> > Host Check Latency: 0.00 / 1.13 / 0.403 sec
> > # Active Host / Service Checks: 2159 / 18342
> > # Passive Host / Service Checks: 0 / 0
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Lawrence Findley >
> > To: Nagios Developers List >
> > Sent: Tue, August 3, 2010 12:42:12 PM
> > Subject: [Nagios-devel] 1.5 year execution time?
> >
> >
> > Here is the text:
> >
> >
> > Monitoring Performance
> > Service Check Execution Time: 0.00 / 46912714.32 / 30610220.908 sec
> > Service Check Latency: 0.00 / 3.40 / 0.242 sec
> > Host Check Execution Time: 0.01 / 8.02 / 1.077 sec
> > Host Check Latency: 0.00 / 1.13 / 0.403 sec
> > # Active Host / Service Checks: 2159 / 18342
> > # Passive Host / Service Checks: 0 / 0
> > I have tried removing status.dat and retention files. Within a few
> > minutes, it
> > goes back to these numbers.
> >
> > Anyone with idea?
> > Thank you.
> > -Larry Findley
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the
> > Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share
> > of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details:
> >
> http://p.sf.net/sf
...[email truncated]...
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]