Re: [Nagios-devel] ulimit for NRPE
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 8:36 am
--gnQ/OOKD4CRsnGw/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 09:03:01AM +0100, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> This is simple enough to do outside of the daemon, so it will probably=20
> not be implemented any time soon inside it. At least not without a=20
> patch. Which reminds me. I've got to get going on that 2.1 release.
Can you give me an example of how this might be done in inetd
mode? I'd think that one would have to put the limit on all of
inetd as opposed to just NRPE.
> simple syscall. Would anybody be interested in hacking up some=20
> BSD/AIX/HPUX/Tru64 code for that? I'm thinking the equivalence of the=20
> sysinfo(2) and statfs(2) syscalls on linux, for starters.
I'd be concerned that doing so will lead to NRPE being part
transport and part plugin which will lead to less stability.
I suggest focusing on things to make it a better / more secure
execution daemon.
-Jason Martin
--=20
Modern man is the missing link between apes and human beings.
This message is PGP/MIME signed.
--gnQ/OOKD4CRsnGw/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: --no-verbose
iD8DBQFB/6/+l2ODWuqVSBMRAkW7AJ4x1QzOua7KroCmYs2qGszv9ZNcXACePHH4
YxKksilAgrtPNcKODA81h/w=
=DYtc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--gnQ/OOKD4CRsnGw/--
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 09:03:01AM +0100, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> This is simple enough to do outside of the daemon, so it will probably=20
> not be implemented any time soon inside it. At least not without a=20
> patch. Which reminds me. I've got to get going on that 2.1 release.
Can you give me an example of how this might be done in inetd
mode? I'd think that one would have to put the limit on all of
inetd as opposed to just NRPE.
> simple syscall. Would anybody be interested in hacking up some=20
> BSD/AIX/HPUX/Tru64 code for that? I'm thinking the equivalence of the=20
> sysinfo(2) and statfs(2) syscalls on linux, for starters.
I'd be concerned that doing so will lead to NRPE being part
transport and part plugin which will lead to less stability.
I suggest focusing on things to make it a better / more secure
execution daemon.
-Jason Martin
--=20
Modern man is the missing link between apes and human beings.
This message is PGP/MIME signed.
--gnQ/OOKD4CRsnGw/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: --no-verbose
iD8DBQFB/6/+l2ODWuqVSBMRAkW7AJ4x1QzOua7KroCmYs2qGszv9ZNcXACePHH4
YxKksilAgrtPNcKODA81h/w=
=DYtc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--gnQ/OOKD4CRsnGw/--
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]