Re: [Nagios-devel] Nagios 3 Performance Monitoring
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 8:38 am
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ethan Galstad wrote:
> Hendrik Bäcker wrote:
>> Hi List,
>>
>> just want to say: Latest CVS Code performs well.
>>
>> After the last macro fixing and memory leak fixes my System works well
>> with all instances running, ePN off, large_installation_tweaks on,
>> rescheduling window on.
>>
>> Result:
>>
>> AVG SVC Latency in worst case on 1.5 seconds, since 25 hours.
>>
>> My performance graphs are balanced well, memory usage is OK, System load
>> is between 3.0 and 7.0 (with Nagios 2.x the Load is much higher 12.0 or
>> 15.0).
>>
>> -
>> Hendrik
> [snip]
>
>
> Excellent!
That looks like really nice numbers! I hope I'll get soon the clearance
to start migrating to 3.0
Out of curiosity, what's the status of the ePN in Nagios 3.0? Is it at
least as functional as Nagios 2.0? I'm using it heavily right now and I
have no idea what the impact of dropping it might be. So far I haven't
encountered any issue or memory leaks using the ePN in Nagios 2.0...
- --
Thomas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHOIFi6dZ+Kt5BchYRAswOAKDMwt29RLyU0gaLryJJrPxqicezTQCfSgfi
QAPqKjfCgJT9vVnrUl8Yfo0=
=ycoC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]
Hash: SHA1
Ethan Galstad wrote:
> Hendrik Bäcker wrote:
>> Hi List,
>>
>> just want to say: Latest CVS Code performs well.
>>
>> After the last macro fixing and memory leak fixes my System works well
>> with all instances running, ePN off, large_installation_tweaks on,
>> rescheduling window on.
>>
>> Result:
>>
>> AVG SVC Latency in worst case on 1.5 seconds, since 25 hours.
>>
>> My performance graphs are balanced well, memory usage is OK, System load
>> is between 3.0 and 7.0 (with Nagios 2.x the Load is much higher 12.0 or
>> 15.0).
>>
>> -
>> Hendrik
> [snip]
>
>
> Excellent!
That looks like really nice numbers! I hope I'll get soon the clearance
to start migrating to 3.0
Out of curiosity, what's the status of the ePN in Nagios 3.0? Is it at
least as functional as Nagios 2.0? I'm using it heavily right now and I
have no idea what the impact of dropping it might be. So far I haven't
encountered any issue or memory leaks using the ePN in Nagios 2.0...
- --
Thomas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHOIFi6dZ+Kt5BchYRAswOAKDMwt29RLyU0gaLryJJrPxqicezTQCfSgfi
QAPqKjfCgJT9vVnrUl8Yfo0=
=ycoC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]