Re: [Nagios-devel] =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9f=2E_=3A_Nagios-devel_?=
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2005 9:18 am
Surely, but given that we don't live in a perfect world.... 
I really don't see any downside to putting these #defines in a file that
doesn't get included in NEBs.
Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> Ben wrote:
>
>> Actually, it occured to me that this wouldn't be a problem if nagios'
>> #defines were simply in a file not needed by NEB modules.
>>
>
> The real solution would be to fix glib though. It's rude to export
> such common-place macros. There's a reason POSIX throws in a _t for
> all their type-declarations and gcc has double underscores for
> internal macros.
>
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]
I really don't see any downside to putting these #defines in a file that
doesn't get included in NEBs.
Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> Ben wrote:
>
>> Actually, it occured to me that this wouldn't be a problem if nagios'
>> #defines were simply in a file not needed by NEB modules.
>>
>
> The real solution would be to fix glib though. It's rude to export
> such common-place macros. There's a reason POSIX throws in a _t for
> all their type-declarations and gcc has double underscores for
> internal macros.
>
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]