Re: [Nagios-devel] Patch RFC - Nagios 3.2 - permanently remove
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 10:08 pm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am 30.10.09 16:32, schrieb Max:
>
> So I am thinking that we could conditionally perform that additional
> sleep if use_large_installation_tweaks in nagios.cfg is set to 0
> instead of just removing the code and submit that as our patch.
>
> Thoughts / opinions?
Sounds like the best of both - non hogging for smaller env but more
performance for biger environments.
But where to draw the line?
Bring us a patch against latest cvs head and I will test it in my lab.
Reporting back to the list, of course.
- -
Hendrik
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAkrvWDgACgkQlI0PwfxLQjlZuwCdGjGief5JJPV4PAn8f0Dr0u2I
SYoAn3zKcPMWmMFenr6LusZp1E1h+MbP
=QzgH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]
Hash: SHA1
Am 30.10.09 16:32, schrieb Max:
>
> So I am thinking that we could conditionally perform that additional
> sleep if use_large_installation_tweaks in nagios.cfg is set to 0
> instead of just removing the code and submit that as our patch.
>
> Thoughts / opinions?
Sounds like the best of both - non hogging for smaller env but more
performance for biger environments.
But where to draw the line?
Bring us a patch against latest cvs head and I will test it in my lab.
Reporting back to the list, of course.
- -
Hendrik
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAkrvWDgACgkQlI0PwfxLQjlZuwCdGjGief5JJPV4PAn8f0Dr0u2I
SYoAn3zKcPMWmMFenr6LusZp1E1h+MbP
=QzgH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]