Re: [Nagios-devel] Implied/Additive inheritance
Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 3:15 pm
Although the documentation does not make this clear, implied and additive i=
nheritance applies to many other objects and directives. I'm personally us=
ing it on hostgroups, contact_groups, contacts, service_groups, etc. I bel=
ieve that any directive that can be defined as a series of comma-delimited =
strings will support the additive/implied inheritance syntax, although I wo=
uld confirm on anything I didn't mention previously, since I don't know for=
sure.
-Gius =20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Guyot-Sionnest [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 4:26 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-devel] Implied/Additive inheritance
>=20
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>=20
> On 10-07-08 05:44 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> > Hey Team,
> >
> >
> >
> > I am having trouble combining 'Implied' and 'Additive' inheritance
> for
> > normal service notifications. The documentation implies the ability
> to
> > combine 'Implied' with 'Additive' inheritance is restricted to
> > escalations, is this correct? If so, can I suggest this **very**
> > powerful option be expanded to work with normal service
> notifications?
> >
> >
> >
> > The scenario is the primary contact_group ('+support_team' for
> example)
> > is set at the host level. This group is nicely inherited by all the
> > services on that host (very cool). If we add a contact_group
> > ('+developers' for example) to an individual service on that host,
> the
> > primary_contact group information is overridden, and only the
> > 'developers' are contacted.
>=20
> +1... I have the same issue and I reported it a while ago. I don't
> think
> the fix would be so hard, but I haven't had the time to really look
> into it.
>=20
> FWIW I also suggested generric templates, because some of my additive
> templates contains instructions that can be used at multiple places (ex
> hostgroups that can be added to service templates, service
> dependencies,
> etc.
> http://ideas.nagios.org/a/dtd/18864-3955
>=20
>=20
> - --
> Thomas
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>=20
> iEYEARECAAYFAkw1taQACgkQ6dZ+Kt5BchbS5ACg6N+1gJ4/vylIkm5/TSblRJxu
> PmYAn2CweO4Qh7sTeFtzxRaP5lP/F7my
> =3Dhy3m
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>=20
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
> What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
> Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
> _______________________________________________
> Nagios-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/lis ... gios-devel
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]
nheritance applies to many other objects and directives. I'm personally us=
ing it on hostgroups, contact_groups, contacts, service_groups, etc. I bel=
ieve that any directive that can be defined as a series of comma-delimited =
strings will support the additive/implied inheritance syntax, although I wo=
uld confirm on anything I didn't mention previously, since I don't know for=
sure.
-Gius =20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Guyot-Sionnest [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 4:26 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-devel] Implied/Additive inheritance
>=20
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>=20
> On 10-07-08 05:44 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> > Hey Team,
> >
> >
> >
> > I am having trouble combining 'Implied' and 'Additive' inheritance
> for
> > normal service notifications. The documentation implies the ability
> to
> > combine 'Implied' with 'Additive' inheritance is restricted to
> > escalations, is this correct? If so, can I suggest this **very**
> > powerful option be expanded to work with normal service
> notifications?
> >
> >
> >
> > The scenario is the primary contact_group ('+support_team' for
> example)
> > is set at the host level. This group is nicely inherited by all the
> > services on that host (very cool). If we add a contact_group
> > ('+developers' for example) to an individual service on that host,
> the
> > primary_contact group information is overridden, and only the
> > 'developers' are contacted.
>=20
> +1... I have the same issue and I reported it a while ago. I don't
> think
> the fix would be so hard, but I haven't had the time to really look
> into it.
>=20
> FWIW I also suggested generric templates, because some of my additive
> templates contains instructions that can be used at multiple places (ex
> hostgroups that can be added to service templates, service
> dependencies,
> etc.
> http://ideas.nagios.org/a/dtd/18864-3955
>=20
>=20
> - --
> Thomas
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>=20
> iEYEARECAAYFAkw1taQACgkQ6dZ+Kt5BchbS5ACg6N+1gJ4/vylIkm5/TSblRJxu
> PmYAn2CweO4Qh7sTeFtzxRaP5lP/F7my
> =3Dhy3m
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>=20
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
> What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
> Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
> _______________________________________________
> Nagios-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/lis ... gios-devel
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]