Nagios Support Forum

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:nagios-devel-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Lee Fitz
> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 9:27 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Nagios-devel] Overuse of active monitoring
>=20
> one person told me that Im overusing active monitoring.
>=20
> In my design, Im using mostly active monitoring' via Nagios.
>=20
> I am using passive monitoring (and a little active) for 27 machines
but am
> planning on using active monitoring
> for 30-50 more because of security restrictions.
>=20
> The location of the Nagios Monitoring Host is inside a secure area,
> consequently the only way I can get at the
> 30-50 additional machines outside the secure area is via active
monitoring
> since I can send out of the secure
> area but no passive monitoring can come in.
>=20
> I did NOT see anything in the documentation or user group traffic that
> implied that I could NOT (or should
> not) use more active monitoring than passive monitoring. The
> documentation seems to indicate that I could use
> all active monitoring if I decided to.
>=20
> Any thoughts would be appreciated.


I don't see a problem with what you are doing at all. Passive monitoring
is most useful when you have a _lot_ of checks that you are doing
(thousands every 5 minutes for example) and you want to split that up
between several machines or you have machines that can't be reached by
your monitoring box directly. If the resources on your monitoring
machine are fine, and I suspect they will be if you're using a PII or
higher in your case, then there's no reason to change.

--
Marc





This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]