Re: [Nagios-devel] Nagios 2.0!
Posted: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:16 am
Okay, so yesterday's msgs answer my questions below--albeit
indirectly.
Given what I read (only the tail of the discussion?) I'd like
to express my whole-hearted thanks and support to both Ethan and
Andreas--even if they *never* do a single iota of work on Nagios
again.
Brent Welch gave a select few CVS write to the EXMH project a
long time ago. [1] Ethan: you may want ask my privately about
his experiences. Just a thought.
steve
- - -
systems & network guy
high energy physics
university of wisconsin
[1] http://exmh.org/
> From: rader
>
> I need to filter by service name, so I implemented
>
> status.cgi?servicefilter=str
>
> It just does strncmp() matches (ie /^str/), but it's still perfectly
> usable. Refer to http://noc.hep.wisc.edu/nagios/ user guest password gues
> t
>
> Is the 1.x version line dead? If not, is there any chance of this
> patch getting into the source? If so, would a patch to the lastest
> 2.0 source be accepted? (Ahhh, assuming the functionality doesn't
> exist in 2.x.)
>
> steve
> - - -
> systems & network guy
> high energy physics
> university of wisconsin
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]
indirectly.
Given what I read (only the tail of the discussion?) I'd like
to express my whole-hearted thanks and support to both Ethan and
Andreas--even if they *never* do a single iota of work on Nagios
again.
Brent Welch gave a select few CVS write to the EXMH project a
long time ago. [1] Ethan: you may want ask my privately about
his experiences. Just a thought.
steve
- - -
systems & network guy
high energy physics
university of wisconsin
[1] http://exmh.org/
> From: rader
>
> I need to filter by service name, so I implemented
>
> status.cgi?servicefilter=str
>
> It just does strncmp() matches (ie /^str/), but it's still perfectly
> usable. Refer to http://noc.hep.wisc.edu/nagios/ user guest password gues
> t
>
> Is the 1.x version line dead? If not, is there any chance of this
> patch getting into the source? If so, would a patch to the lastest
> 2.0 source be accepted? (Ahhh, assuming the functionality doesn't
> exist in 2.x.)
>
> steve
> - - -
> systems & network guy
> high energy physics
> university of wisconsin
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]