Re: [Nagios-devel] Patch RFC - Nagios 3.2 - permanently remove
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:44 am
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Christoph Maser wrote:
> Ok that sounds quite sane. Hm btw. why is line 1115 run_event=FALSE,
> isn't that set already?
Yes, that is a bit of defensive programming I am sure by someone who
wasn't 100% comfortable with the source. I do not know where the
Nagios core team came up with their syntax style, it is one i have
never seen anywhere else and I find it to be ugly.
> Well that would be really interesting to find and fix. Either by fixing
> nanosleep or by not using it.
Agreed
. I don't see any other choices except usleep which is
deprecated on the 2.6.x kernel trees, but I am not a big time C
systems developer so there might be other alternatives.
- Max
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]
> Ok that sounds quite sane. Hm btw. why is line 1115 run_event=FALSE,
> isn't that set already?
Yes, that is a bit of defensive programming I am sure by someone who
wasn't 100% comfortable with the source. I do not know where the
Nagios core team came up with their syntax style, it is one i have
never seen anywhere else and I find it to be ugly.
> Well that would be really interesting to find and fix. Either by fixing
> nanosleep or by not using it.
Agreed
. I don't see any other choices except usleep which isdeprecated on the 2.6.x kernel trees, but I am not a big time C
systems developer so there might be other alternatives.
- Max
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]