Re: [Nagios-devel] Nagios is dead! Long live Icinga!
Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 6:23 pm
--0016e65681b097d2d40469577267
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hello together,
We brought some discussion into that mailing-list and even though this
wasn't our main goal, it is a good thing.
I've read an article by Matt Asay from cnet and his thoughts are explaining
the reasons to fork Nagios
better then anything else i can write in the moment:
"While it's too early to tell whether the fork will succeed, the action
already demonstrates both the health and disease of the Nagios community.
Health, because a fork or spin-off of the original project, demonstrates
that there is an active community of users and developers that cares enough
about the project to ensure it's done "right" (i.e., according to their
preferences).
Disease, because clearly the core Nagios developers weren't serving the
broad Nagios community well enough."
(http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10234275-16.html)
And to quote you Andreas:
"Ah well. I'm sure it'll all work out alright in the end somehow though."
Hope i see you soon to talk about that personaly.
That's it for now
Bernd Erk
--0016e65681b097d2d40469577267
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello together,We brought some discussion into that mailing-list an=
d even though this wasn't our main goal, it is a good thing.I&#=
39;ve read an article by Matt Asay from cnet and his thoughts are explainin=
g the reasons to fork Nagios
better then anything else i can write in the moment:"While it&#=
39;s too early to tell whether the fork will succeed, the
action already demonstrates both the health and disease of the Nagios
community.
Health, because a fork or spin-off of the original project,
demonstrates that there is an active community of users and developers
that cares enough about the project to ensure it's done "right&quo=
t; (i.e.,
according to their preferences).
Disease, because clearly the core Nagios developers weren't serving the=
broad Nagios community well enough."(http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-102342=
75-16.html)
And to quote you Andreas:"Ah well. I'm sure it'll =
all work out alright in the end somehow
though."Hope i see you soon to talk about that personaly.=
That's it for nowBernd Erk
--0016e65681b097d2d40469577267--
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hello together,
We brought some discussion into that mailing-list and even though this
wasn't our main goal, it is a good thing.
I've read an article by Matt Asay from cnet and his thoughts are explaining
the reasons to fork Nagios
better then anything else i can write in the moment:
"While it's too early to tell whether the fork will succeed, the action
already demonstrates both the health and disease of the Nagios community.
Health, because a fork or spin-off of the original project, demonstrates
that there is an active community of users and developers that cares enough
about the project to ensure it's done "right" (i.e., according to their
preferences).
Disease, because clearly the core Nagios developers weren't serving the
broad Nagios community well enough."
(http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10234275-16.html)
And to quote you Andreas:
"Ah well. I'm sure it'll all work out alright in the end somehow though."
Hope i see you soon to talk about that personaly.
That's it for now
Bernd Erk
--0016e65681b097d2d40469577267
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello together,We brought some discussion into that mailing-list an=
d even though this wasn't our main goal, it is a good thing.I&#=
39;ve read an article by Matt Asay from cnet and his thoughts are explainin=
g the reasons to fork Nagios
better then anything else i can write in the moment:"While it&#=
39;s too early to tell whether the fork will succeed, the
action already demonstrates both the health and disease of the Nagios
community.
Health, because a fork or spin-off of the original project,
demonstrates that there is an active community of users and developers
that cares enough about the project to ensure it's done "right&quo=
t; (i.e.,
according to their preferences).
Disease, because clearly the core Nagios developers weren't serving the=
broad Nagios community well enough."(http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-102342=
75-16.html)
And to quote you Andreas:"Ah well. I'm sure it'll =
all work out alright in the end somehow
though."Hope i see you soon to talk about that personaly.=
That's it for nowBernd Erk
--0016e65681b097d2d40469577267--
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]