Re: [Nagios-devel] Removing host checks for non-OK passive results
Posted: Wed May 24, 2006 1:59 am
--nextPart9419725.vWJRODJS01
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Am Mittwoch 24 Mai 2006 11:37 schrieb Bruce Campbell:
> > We considered using a "cache" value for a host status - I think the idea
> > has merit and would reduce a large number of host checks, especially if
> > something suddenly happened to a large set of services on one host.
> > However, we baulked at going ahead because there's bound to be some
> > subtle situation where this would be undesireable.
>
> See the "Workaround for 'Host DOWN' false-positives" thread for another
> way of doing it (slurp in the entire status.dat file if you've got a small
> installation, submit passive host check results from a service check if
> you've got a large installation). =A0Both have the advantage of being dri=
ven
> by Nagios.
There is another Tread 'Host DOWN' false-positives" on nagios-users.
What do you think about that solution ?
J=F6rg
--nextPart9419725.vWJRODJS01
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBEdC55DBMhsDLU5LcRAvt2AKDlZcoWz5ozwVHseFgkhVULnsTYawCgqvYq
8kgbMXMbDVbVmbiG9wYebC8=
=CUFo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart9419725.vWJRODJS01--
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Am Mittwoch 24 Mai 2006 11:37 schrieb Bruce Campbell:
> > We considered using a "cache" value for a host status - I think the idea
> > has merit and would reduce a large number of host checks, especially if
> > something suddenly happened to a large set of services on one host.
> > However, we baulked at going ahead because there's bound to be some
> > subtle situation where this would be undesireable.
>
> See the "Workaround for 'Host DOWN' false-positives" thread for another
> way of doing it (slurp in the entire status.dat file if you've got a small
> installation, submit passive host check results from a service check if
> you've got a large installation). =A0Both have the advantage of being dri=
ven
> by Nagios.
There is another Tread 'Host DOWN' false-positives" on nagios-users.
What do you think about that solution ?
J=F6rg
--nextPart9419725.vWJRODJS01
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBEdC55DBMhsDLU5LcRAvt2AKDlZcoWz5ozwVHseFgkhVULnsTYawCgqvYq
8kgbMXMbDVbVmbiG9wYebC8=
=CUFo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart9419725.vWJRODJS01--
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]