RE: RE : [Nagios-devel] Re: Re : Patch submission for comments :
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 8:28 am
This is precisely why I did nagios-db. If its feature set works for you
and you are ok running nagios2, then you should give it a try.
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Andre Bergei wrote:
> I can't comment on the code, but faster CGI's are essensial for large scale implementations of Nagios.
> We got 3000 hosts and 30000 services, with Nagios 1.2 and the chain hash patch
> Applied it takes 20 seconds to run the service status detail for a host. (a 2x 2.8 Ghz Xeon)
> I read somewhere that the patched 1.2 cgi's are roughly the same as the 2.0 cgi's.
>
> Needless to say, out users are getting pretty frustrated.
>
> Also with lots of users hammering the server executing the cgi's, the server gets very busy with
> All the cgi's grinding away eating all the cpu cycles.
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]
and you are ok running nagios2, then you should give it a try.
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Andre Bergei wrote:
> I can't comment on the code, but faster CGI's are essensial for large scale implementations of Nagios.
> We got 3000 hosts and 30000 services, with Nagios 1.2 and the chain hash patch
> Applied it takes 20 seconds to run the service status detail for a host. (a 2x 2.8 Ghz Xeon)
> I read somewhere that the patched 1.2 cgi's are roughly the same as the 2.0 cgi's.
>
> Needless to say, out users are getting pretty frustrated.
>
> Also with lots of users hammering the server executing the cgi's, the server gets very busy with
> All the cgi's grinding away eating all the cpu cycles.
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]