Re: [Nagios-devel] minor nsca license nit
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 9:38 am
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ethan Galstad wrote:
| Michael Thomas wrote:
|> I'm preparing a package for nsca for distribution with Fedora, and ran
|> into a small nit with respect to the license. Fedora is getting pretty
|> picky about having accurate licensing information for packages, so I was
|> hoping that someone here could clear this up.
|>
|> All of the *.c and *.h sourcce files for nsca claim to be valid for
|> GPLv2 and later, except for nsca.c and send_nsca.c which simply say:
|> * License: GPL v2
|> That is, these two files omit the 'or (at your option) any later
|> version' clause.
|>
|> Is the intended license for nsca 'GPLv2 only', or 'GPLv2 or later'? Are
|> there any upcoming releases planned that might be able to include this
|> clarification?
|>
|> Regards,
|>
|> --Wart
|
| It was intended as "GPLv2 only" . GPLv3 was still under discussion and
| fairly contentious, which caused me to change the wording to clarify
| things.
|
| I'll have to revisit the GPL 3 changes again to see what effect it might
| have - particularly for ISVs and service providers. I don't want the
| license to be too restrictive on usage, but I'm open to comments from
| the community on this.
IMHO limiting to a specific GPL version is more restrictive than not
doing so. I don't see any incentives in bumping the version but when it
comes to merging code from different projects the "vX-only" can become a
showstopper.
Allowing v2 or higher gives people choice and prevents future conflicts.
~ As long as it stays v2+ it doesn't remove any rights, it rather grants
the right of bumping the version which guarantee it will stay compatible
with any future GPL software.
- --
Thomas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFIA5aY6dZ+Kt5BchYRAn5iAKCvUubDAYc08mUIkRK2d2HDkHUxbwCePNmV
Qb+VqcpwyP89pvfo2zoUUew=
=nhxp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]
Hash: SHA1
Ethan Galstad wrote:
| Michael Thomas wrote:
|> I'm preparing a package for nsca for distribution with Fedora, and ran
|> into a small nit with respect to the license. Fedora is getting pretty
|> picky about having accurate licensing information for packages, so I was
|> hoping that someone here could clear this up.
|>
|> All of the *.c and *.h sourcce files for nsca claim to be valid for
|> GPLv2 and later, except for nsca.c and send_nsca.c which simply say:
|> * License: GPL v2
|> That is, these two files omit the 'or (at your option) any later
|> version' clause.
|>
|> Is the intended license for nsca 'GPLv2 only', or 'GPLv2 or later'? Are
|> there any upcoming releases planned that might be able to include this
|> clarification?
|>
|> Regards,
|>
|> --Wart
|
| It was intended as "GPLv2 only" . GPLv3 was still under discussion and
| fairly contentious, which caused me to change the wording to clarify
| things.
|
| I'll have to revisit the GPL 3 changes again to see what effect it might
| have - particularly for ISVs and service providers. I don't want the
| license to be too restrictive on usage, but I'm open to comments from
| the community on this.
IMHO limiting to a specific GPL version is more restrictive than not
doing so. I don't see any incentives in bumping the version but when it
comes to merging code from different projects the "vX-only" can become a
showstopper.
Allowing v2 or higher gives people choice and prevents future conflicts.
~ As long as it stays v2+ it doesn't remove any rights, it rather grants
the right of bumping the version which guarantee it will stay compatible
with any future GPL software.
- --
Thomas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFIA5aY6dZ+Kt5BchYRAn5iAKCvUubDAYc08mUIkRK2d2HDkHUxbwCePNmV
Qb+VqcpwyP89pvfo2zoUUew=
=nhxp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]