Adding similar hosts en masse
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 1:06 pm
Not sure that this is the correct place for this but I figured I will start here before moving on to any other part of the support forums.
Is there a way to apply configuration of pods of hosts? For example if I am using a non distributed setup of Nagios XI, but had the intent of monitoring pods of hosts that are identical between pods and will follow some sort IP schema that denotes the same types of devices. Is there an easier way of adding each to the XI CCM hosts section so as to reduce error from adding in the hosts.
Full example: POD 1
device 1: xxx.xxx.xxx.254
device 2: xxx.xxx.xxx.200
device 3: xxx.xxx.xxx.201
device 4: xxx.xxx.xxx.10
device 5: xxx.xxx.xxx.15
So on and so forth, now pods 2 through whatever will have devices reachable via the same last octet. So I guess what am I asking is two part, one add multiple hosts as a group in one shot and secondly do so by entering some base IP (XXX.XXX.XXX)and the other hosts will attach the last octet as appropriate.
Am I looking for too much here or missing something obvious?
Thanks in advance for any advice or input
Nigel
Is there a way to apply configuration of pods of hosts? For example if I am using a non distributed setup of Nagios XI, but had the intent of monitoring pods of hosts that are identical between pods and will follow some sort IP schema that denotes the same types of devices. Is there an easier way of adding each to the XI CCM hosts section so as to reduce error from adding in the hosts.
Full example: POD 1
device 1: xxx.xxx.xxx.254
device 2: xxx.xxx.xxx.200
device 3: xxx.xxx.xxx.201
device 4: xxx.xxx.xxx.10
device 5: xxx.xxx.xxx.15
So on and so forth, now pods 2 through whatever will have devices reachable via the same last octet. So I guess what am I asking is two part, one add multiple hosts as a group in one shot and secondly do so by entering some base IP (XXX.XXX.XXX)and the other hosts will attach the last octet as appropriate.
Am I looking for too much here or missing something obvious?
Thanks in advance for any advice or input
Nigel