Data shown on NNA Vs. XI
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:51 am
Hello,
I have a couple questions about the data shown in NNA/XI.
First, in NNA (or XI for that matter) when i see a graph showing Bytes/flows/Packets, for what time period is that data? For example if the peak of a graph in NNA shows 3.7GB, over what amount of time did the source move that amount of traffic? In NNA, if i randomly pick a graph peak, and look at its Bytes and then switch the graph to Bytes/sec, and then divide Bytes/Bytes per sec, i get about 35 seconds. If i do this with a random sample of sources i get approximately the same number of seconds. I am assuming this relates to the 30 second interval i set in netflow for all my sources. But i want to be sure.
Second, when i look at the same source/peak in NNA versus XI, i sometimes see different amounts of Bytes shown. I have attached a jpeg which demonstrates what i mean. For the same time the highest peak in the NNA is 4.4 GB, when in XI it shows the highest peak as 9GB.
thanks, i appreciate your help.
I have a couple questions about the data shown in NNA/XI.
First, in NNA (or XI for that matter) when i see a graph showing Bytes/flows/Packets, for what time period is that data? For example if the peak of a graph in NNA shows 3.7GB, over what amount of time did the source move that amount of traffic? In NNA, if i randomly pick a graph peak, and look at its Bytes and then switch the graph to Bytes/sec, and then divide Bytes/Bytes per sec, i get about 35 seconds. If i do this with a random sample of sources i get approximately the same number of seconds. I am assuming this relates to the 30 second interval i set in netflow for all my sources. But i want to be sure.
Second, when i look at the same source/peak in NNA versus XI, i sometimes see different amounts of Bytes shown. I have attached a jpeg which demonstrates what i mean. For the same time the highest peak in the NNA is 4.4 GB, when in XI it shows the highest peak as 9GB.
thanks, i appreciate your help.