federated Nagios or DDBB replication?
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2018 4:40 am
Hi all,
I am right now in the final part to deploy a Nagios XI solution with the following architecture using openstack:
DC1 (production):
2 servers as Nagios XI frontends
3 servers as BBDD (MySQL Enterprise with innoDB)
DC2 (PRE/DEV/TEST - some productive environments):
2 servers as Nagios XI frontends
3 servers as BBDD (MySQL Enterprise with innoDB)
I don't know which would be the best solution in this case, replicate DDBB, configuration files and so on or, federate both systems, the main requirement is that in case that for any reason the Nagios XI instance on DC1 felts down, DC2 Nagios instance must be able to continues providing Monitoring services, even for all the systems that are in DC1 and viceversa, from my point of view federated would be better but I don't know if there is an issue to cross all information between both systems, under my understanding both should work as "master"
Any help is welcome.
BR
I am right now in the final part to deploy a Nagios XI solution with the following architecture using openstack:
DC1 (production):
2 servers as Nagios XI frontends
3 servers as BBDD (MySQL Enterprise with innoDB)
DC2 (PRE/DEV/TEST - some productive environments):
2 servers as Nagios XI frontends
3 servers as BBDD (MySQL Enterprise with innoDB)
I don't know which would be the best solution in this case, replicate DDBB, configuration files and so on or, federate both systems, the main requirement is that in case that for any reason the Nagios XI instance on DC1 felts down, DC2 Nagios instance must be able to continues providing Monitoring services, even for all the systems that are in DC1 and viceversa, from my point of view federated would be better but I don't know if there is an issue to cross all information between both systems, under my understanding both should work as "master"
Any help is welcome.
BR