About control deployement
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2020 8:14 am
Hi,
we are currently migrating from TIVOLI monitoring to NAGIOS XI.
The main deployment method used is based on hostgroup inheritance e.g.
SERVICE = CpuUsageWindows
xxxxxHostgroup= Windows_server
xxxxxxxxxxhost1
xxxxxxxxxxhost2
xxxxxxxxxx...
In the future, we plan to use a NAGVIS dashboard and use a ServiceGroups-based app breakdown e.g.
SERVICEGROUP = Application TEST
Having deployed the controls on hostgroups through inheritance we cannot populate the ServiceGroups with checks for individual hosts.
Solution:
To overcome this problem, we intended to (where necessary) deploy the same control as well as on the hostgroup even on a single host.
In this way we are assured of a centralized management of controls through groups, and that control on a single host can be added to the servicegroup of the affected application.
We currently have around 1000 hosts, on each host there are at least 10 controls.
On 500 hosts we should use the solution just described.
We are sure that the control is not duplicated, but could there be any other problems? (Performance, DB data incoherence ...)
we are currently migrating from TIVOLI monitoring to NAGIOS XI.
The main deployment method used is based on hostgroup inheritance e.g.
SERVICE = CpuUsageWindows
xxxxxHostgroup= Windows_server
xxxxxxxxxxhost1
xxxxxxxxxxhost2
xxxxxxxxxx...
In the future, we plan to use a NAGVIS dashboard and use a ServiceGroups-based app breakdown e.g.
SERVICEGROUP = Application TEST
Having deployed the controls on hostgroups through inheritance we cannot populate the ServiceGroups with checks for individual hosts.
Solution:
To overcome this problem, we intended to (where necessary) deploy the same control as well as on the hostgroup even on a single host.
In this way we are assured of a centralized management of controls through groups, and that control on a single host can be added to the servicegroup of the affected application.
We currently have around 1000 hosts, on each host there are at least 10 controls.
On 500 hosts we should use the solution just described.
We are sure that the control is not duplicated, but could there be any other problems? (Performance, DB data incoherence ...)