A custom_check_mem error value too big.

[lee.krause]

When I run the custom_check_mem script i get the following errors:
./custom_check_mem: line 111: 111G: value too great for base (error token is "111G")
./custom_check_mem: line 132: [[: stack
0: syntax error in expression (error token is "0")
./custom_check_mem: line 136: [[: stack
0: syntax error in expression (error token is "0")
./custom_check_mem: line 150: [: -gt: unary operator expected
OK - / 262144 MB (stack
0%) Free Memory, Used: MB, Shared: MB | total=262144MB free=MB used=MB shared=MB


Is there an update to this script? I'm running Solaris 10.

[Box293]

How did you install this plugin? Was it installed via this method?

https://assets.nagios.com/downloads/nag ... _Agent.pdf

[lee.krause]

Yes it was installed as the document says.

[Box293]

Can you please show us the full command you are using to test at the command line. For example:

Code: Select all

/opt/nagios/libexec/custom_check_mem -w 20 -c 10

[lee.krause]

~ # /opt/nagios/libexec/custom_check_mem -w 20 -c 10
/opt/nagios/libexec/custom_check_mem: line 110: 110G: value too great for base (error token is "110G")
/opt/nagios/libexec/custom_check_mem: line 131: [[: stack
0: syntax error in expression (error token is "0")
/opt/nagios/libexec/custom_check_mem: line 135: [[: stack
0: syntax error in expression (error token is "0")
/opt/nagios/libexec/custom_check_mem: line 149: [: -gt: unary operator expected
OK - / 262144 MB (stack
0%) Free Memory, Used: MB, Shared: MB | total=262144MB free=MB used=MB shared=MB

[Box293]

Would you be able to upload the plugin here as a text file. I am unable to reproduce on a test server I have so I want to make sure we have the same version of the plugin.

[lee.krause]

Here's the txt file

[Box293]

I think this forum thread has the answer to your problem:

https://support.nagios.com/forum/viewto ... 10#p187375

Can you see if this modified version fixes your issue:

custom_check_mem.txt

[lee.krause]

I changed the code in that section for SunOS and have noted in the text document.

[rkennedy]

The file you just posted looks to be different from what @Box293 attached as a fix, could you try the fixed version and let us know the new output you're seeing?