NSCA: Time difference in packet: 11018287 - Dropping packet

Support forum for Nagios Core, Nagios Plugins, NCPA, NRPE, NSCA, NDOUtils and more. Engage with the community of users including those using the open source solutions.
Locked
philipishungry
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2020 2:07 pm

NSCA: Time difference in packet: 11018287 - Dropping packet

Post by philipishungry »

I have compiled NSCA with libmcrypt on omnios, an solaris/illumos variant.

Whenever NSCA requests are received, NSCA responds with a very large number, such as "Time difference in packet: 11018287". This can be worked around with setting "max_package_age=0" but ideally I would like to get to the bottom of this. Encryption works with this setting as well as sending unencrypted. If i do not set "max_package_age=0", unencrypted or not always fails with time differences.

I have compiled WITHOUT libmcrypt support and NSCA functions correctly and has no problems with time differences.

Both NSCA and libmcrypt have been compiled as 64 bits, with only prefix as a configure option. NSCA finds libmcrypt via CFLAGS & LDFLAGS.

so I would appreciate any feedback at what might be making this combination bork the timestamp?
User avatar
cdienger
Support Tech
Posts: 5045
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2017 11:26 am

Re: NSCA: Time difference in packet: 11018287 - Dropping pac

Post by cdienger »

It looks like this is just a debugging message:

Code: Select all

        if(debug==TRUE)
                  syslog(LOG_ERR,"Time difference in packet: %lu seconds for host %s", packet_age, host_name)
Try setting debug=0 in the nsca.cfg file and restarting the service.

The source can be found at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Nagio ... src/nsca.c.
As of May 25th, 2018, all communications with Nagios Enterprises and its employees are covered under our new Privacy Policy.
philipishungry
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2020 2:07 pm

Re: NSCA: Time difference in packet: 11018287 - Dropping pac

Post by philipishungry »

thanks for your response, I am looking at the nsca.c code now.

yes it is a debug message, but NSCA drops the package, and the service will then become stale.

everytime send_nsca sends to NSCA, it is the exact same time difference,11018287, so I am thinking it is something to do with the setting up on the current_time and packet_time variables.

in NSCA WITHOUT libmcrypt, I set 2 new debug messages directly under that debug message:

Code: Select all

          syslog(LOG_ERR,"Current time in seconds:: %lu", current_time);
          syslog(LOG_ERR,"Packet time in seconds:: %lu", packet_time);
and the debug message in log when run is:

Code: Select all

[ID 309006 daemon.error] Current time in seconds:: 0
[ID 575921 daemon.error] Packet time in seconds:: 0
shouldn't current time be showing seconds from epoch, ie 1586812468, rather than 0?
I
ssax
Dreams In Code
Posts: 7682
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 12:54 pm

Re: NSCA: Time difference in packet: 11018287 - Dropping pac

Post by ssax »

Are both systems time settings the same? (time, TZ, etc)

What version of NSCA exactly?
philipishungry
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2020 2:07 pm

Re: NSCA: Time difference in packet: 11018287 - Dropping pac

Post by philipishungry »

yes, both time zones match. also I have tried from a third host sending to the NSCA daemon and time differences are always the same.

the version is 2.9.2.

I have decided to use NRDP instead of NSCA so I do not necessarily need a resolution to this.
ssax
Dreams In Code
Posts: 7682
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 12:54 pm

Re: NSCA: Time difference in packet: 11018287 - Dropping pac

Post by ssax »

That's what I would use as well.

Are we okay to lock this up then? If you're switching I'm not going to run down the rabbit hole as I haven't seen this before.
User avatar
cdienger
Support Tech
Posts: 5045
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2017 11:26 am

Re: NSCA: Time difference in packet: 11018287 - Dropping pac

Post by cdienger »

2.10 was released earlier this month if you want to test NSCA again:

https://github.com/NagiosEnterprises/ns ... ANGELOG.md

There does appear to have been a changes to the nsca.c file including the packet_age variable.
As of May 25th, 2018, all communications with Nagios Enterprises and its employees are covered under our new Privacy Policy.
philipishungry
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2020 2:07 pm

Re: NSCA: Time difference in packet: 11018287 - Dropping pac

Post by philipishungry »

I will definitely have a look at 2.1.0 over the weekend

leave this open and I will let you know what I find.

Philip
swolf

Re: NSCA: Time difference in packet: 11018287 - Dropping pac

Post by swolf »

NSCA maintainer here,

Just wanted to let you know that I did take a look into this. I suspect 2.10.0 will "fix" your issue, but not in the way you wanted.

It looks like the packet_age check was actually removed in this commit. What's really strange is that even in the 2.9.2 release, the packet age and current time are left uninitialized, meaning the check was useless to begin with. As for why we haven't seen this before, I'm guessing that there was something slightly different in the stack layout on your Unix+?? system than in the CentOS+gcc systems we tend to use for testing.

In short, if you're planning to use NRDP anyways, don't feel pressured to do any more work with this.

Regards,
Sebastian Wolf
philipishungry
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2020 2:07 pm

Re: NSCA: Time difference in packet: 11018287 - Dropping pac

Post by philipishungry »

Hi ,

yeah, i looked at that and was not brave enough to say that it was not being initialized, i have a very low/no skill in C so did not want to point out something, that would surely have been pointed out in NSCAs long history. go figure.

thanks for your post. that has cleared up a lot and I am happy using NSCA without package age set.

Philip
Locked