Hash: SHA1
On 10-10-03 11:33 PM, Ethan Galstad wrote:
> There's been a few mentions of switching to git for the Nagios Core
> code. The original plan a while back was to switch from CVS to Git
> "Real Soon Now" (tm), but I was the major holdup because I didn't have
> time to learn Yet Another Source Code Management System.
>
> Since my time never gets any freer, CVS is king for Nagios Core for the
> foreseeable future. I can easily handle CVS and SVN, but I don't have
> enough free time to wrap my head around the Git and Bazaar concepts to
> ensure they would actually work for me for Core.
>
> You Git guys seem to have things figured out with all the
> cloning/mastering/etc you do. As long as you can send unified diffs,
> the Nagios universe is in good shape.
Ok, I'm sure we'll live with that
Just one note though, git-svn makesit very easy to apply Git's ease of use (I sure that means nothing to
you
) on a subversion repository. This mean from Git I can easilycheck-out latest svn code, rebase if needed and apply git commits on the
SVN trunk or branches.
So if (and I emphasise on the "if") switching the core to SVN is a
possibility, that could, IMHO, make the Git-lovers out there much
happier, and I'll be happy to post instruction to clone the svn repo and
explain the normal work flow using git-svn.
I don't want to force anyone's hand, but for me the day I started using
git-svn I also started hating Subversion which was by far the SCM I used
and administered the most before Git.
- --
Thomas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkypVZYACgkQ6dZ+Kt5BchYeggCgx1hrnFjU0TFUA0g8cz/5XjBe
QW4AoO/JtxyatxNQkVWuqELdePzEkpUr
=e2Zb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]