Re: [Nagios-devel] Nagios 3.1.1 eats cpu like mad

Support forum for Nagios Core, Nagios Plugins, NCPA, NRPE, NSCA, NDOUtils and more. Engage with the community of users including those using the open source solutions.
Locked
Guest

Re: [Nagios-devel] Nagios 3.1.1 eats cpu like mad

Post by Guest »

------=_Part_6943_20277074.1249924440104
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


----- "Hiren Patel" escreveu:
> in any case, the changes you suggested were problematic in one way,
> the
> run_async_service_check function can return error on a few occasions,
>
> not limited to the time being invalid. one such condition could be
> dependency constraints, now if we used current_time to get the next
> valid time for such a case, it would return current_time right back,
> so
> nagios will schedule that check right away, and when run again, loop
> in
> the same manner over and over. this I suspect caused the cpu eating
> seen
> with that diff.

This make a lot of sense, but I can't see any change on my server load even with the former patch.
Maybe Andreas can apply your patch and see if the load usage goes down, so we have a go.


-rm

------=_Part_6943_20277074.1249924440104
Content-Type: text/x-patch; name=checks.diff
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=checks.diff

--- checks.c 2009-06-23 19:33:00.000000000 +0200
+++ /tmp/checks.c 2009-08-10 16:33:25.000000000 +0200
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@
preferred_time=current_time+((svc->check_intervalcheck_interval*interval_length));

/* make sure we rescheduled the next service check at a valid time */
- get_next_valid_time(preferred_time,&next_valid_time,svc->check_period_ptr);
+ get_next_valid_time((time_is_valid==FALSE)?current_time:preferred_time,&next_valid_time,svc->check_period_ptr);

/* the service could not be rescheduled properly - set the next check time for next week */
if(time_is_valid==FALSE && next_valid_time==preferred_time){

------=_Part_6943_20277074.1249924440104--





This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]
Locked