PROCS WARNING: 257 processes with STATE = RSZDT
Re: PROCS WARNING: 257 processes with STATE = RSZDT
Ok, rebooting the server was apparently a bad idead. I sent an email to xisupport with details. All our hosts are grey since the reboot. Open service problems is not updated correctly.
in the meantime adn after a mysql repair, the host are green again..
in the meantime adn after a mysql repair, the host are green again..
Nagios XI 5.8.1
https://outsideit.net
https://outsideit.net
-
slansing
- Posts: 7698
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:28 pm
- Location: Travelling through time and space...
Re: PROCS WARNING: 257 processes with STATE = RSZDT
It would make sense if you did not reboot in a safe manner, or nagios, ndo or mysql did not have time to close properly that you would have database corruption and a repair would fix that issue.
Re: PROCS WARNING: 257 processes with STATE = RSZDT
What's your definition of a safe reboot for the Nagios XI server?
Nagios XI 5.8.1
https://outsideit.net
https://outsideit.net
Re: PROCS WARNING: 257 processes with STATE = RSZDT
Code: Select all
shutdown -h nowCode: Select all
rebootFormer Nagios employee
"It is turtles. All. The. Way. Down. . . .and maybe an elephant or two."
VI VI VI - The editor of the Beast!
Come to the Dark Side.
"It is turtles. All. The. Way. Down. . . .and maybe an elephant or two."
VI VI VI - The editor of the Beast!
Come to the Dark Side.
Re: PROCS WARNING: 257 processes with STATE = RSZDT
Well shutdown -r now was the command I executed, but still I got grey hosts afterwards...
I thought maybe I'd better stop mysqld first or so...?
Nagios XI 5.8.1
https://outsideit.net
https://outsideit.net
Re: PROCS WARNING: 257 processes with STATE = RSZDT
hmmm, maybe it was a stuck process. You could:
Code: Select all
service ndo2db stop
service mysqld stop
service postgresql stop
service nagios stop
shutdown -h nowFormer Nagios employee
"It is turtles. All. The. Way. Down. . . .and maybe an elephant or two."
VI VI VI - The editor of the Beast!
Come to the Dark Side.
"It is turtles. All. The. Way. Down. . . .and maybe an elephant or two."
VI VI VI - The editor of the Beast!
Come to the Dark Side.
Re: PROCS WARNING: 257 processes with STATE = RSZDT
The strange thing is that since the reboot, the swap usage is 0 % and seems to stay that way. I never got an answer on my question if I should make our swap file larger by the way?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Nagios XI 5.8.1
https://outsideit.net
https://outsideit.net
Re: PROCS WARNING: 257 processes with STATE = RSZDT
I would not bother if swap is empty. Something must have happened to fill swap, and more swap space may not really compensate for the potential issue that could fill swap quickly. The usual suggestion though is to set swap to 2x your server's ram. Though once you get upwards of 8gb of ram or more, increasing swap will do little good. In fact, swap should not really be used unless your server has too little memory.
Former Nagios employee
"It is turtles. All. The. Way. Down. . . .and maybe an elephant or two."
VI VI VI - The editor of the Beast!
Come to the Dark Side.
"It is turtles. All. The. Way. Down. . . .and maybe an elephant or two."
VI VI VI - The editor of the Beast!
Come to the Dark Side.
Re: PROCS WARNING: 257 processes with STATE = RSZDT
Andy,
It has been some time now since the server rebooted. At the moment the swap space is again in the 'red zone'. I'm considering making the swap larger, but never had to do this in Linux. Is it safe to follow the following procedure I found here: http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Deplo ... dding.html
Recommendations by CentOs are
At the moment the swap is 256 MB (still the same value since I downloaded Nagios XI standard image), so as the server now has 4GB RAM, I should make the swap 4 GB? See image for the (d)evolution of the swap usage.
Grtz
Willem
It has been some time now since the server rebooted. At the moment the swap space is again in the 'red zone'. I'm considering making the swap larger, but never had to do this in Linux. Is it safe to follow the following procedure I found here: http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Deplo ... dding.html
Code: Select all
5.2.1. Extending Swap on an LVM2 Logical Volume
To extend an LVM2 swap logical volume (assuming /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01 is the volume you want to extend):
Disable swapping for the associated logical volume:
# swapoff -v /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01
Resize the LVM2 logical volume by 256 MB:
# lvm lvresize /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01 -L +256M
Format the new swap space:
# mkswap /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01
Enable the extended logical volume:
# swapon -va
Test that the logical volume has been extended properly:
# cat /proc/swaps # free
Code: Select all
df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00
20G 9.6G 8.8G 53% /
tmpfs 1.9G 0 1.9G 0% /dev/shm
/dev/sda1 97M 28M 65M 31% /boot
cifsvol:/root_vdm_2/cifs402/Backups/SRVNAGIOS01
4.9T 3.3T 1.6T 68% /var/Digipolis/Backup
Code: Select all
cat /proc/swaps # free
Filename Type Size Used Priority
/dev/dm-0 partition 262136 214968 -1Code: Select all
If M < 2
S = M *2
Else
S = M + 2Grtz
Willem
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Nagios XI 5.8.1
https://outsideit.net
https://outsideit.net
-
sreinhardt
- -fno-stack-protector
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:10 pm
Re: PROCS WARNING: 257 processes with STATE = RSZDT
As andy said, ideally swap shouldn't be used too much, but it is a good idea to have at least as much swap as memory, to a point (around 6-8gb is more than enough swap). With that said, I would definitely suggest upgrading the swap to a size at least equal to your memory amount, 256mb doesn't give the system much to play around with if memory is getting filled up as well. Your commands above seem just fine for increasing swap, short of changing the sizes that it is allocating.
Nagios-Plugins maintainer exclusively, unless you have other C language bugs with open-source nagios projects, then I am happy to help! Please pm or use other communication to alert me to issues as I no longer track the forum.