Static Linux Agent vs compile scripts

Support forum for Nagios Core, Nagios Plugins, NCPA, NRPE, NSCA, NDOUtils and more. Engage with the community of users including those using the open source solutions.
Locked
lyle
Posts: 158
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2010 3:05 am

Static Linux Agent vs compile scripts

Post by lyle »

I've got some Centos & RHEL clients (5.3, 5.4, and 5.5) that need NRPE agents.

What are the downsides to using your "Static" Linux agent, vs the normal compile & install route?

My guesses:
* I note the "under development and should be considered beta" comment (how shaky is it?)
* larger size, since it's fully linked (but size may not be a big concern)
* would save time doing the installs (though all of your packaging on the install scripts I've used so far seems quite good)

Thanks...Lyle
mguthrie
Posts: 4380
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:21 am

Re: Static Linux Agent vs compile scripts

Post by mguthrie »

If you're setting up nrpe on CentOS and RHEL, I definitely recommend using this doc and download. It's up to date and comes with an install script that does almost everything for you.
http://library.nagios.com/library/produ ... inux-agent

I haven't actually tested the static agent in a while, so I'm not certain of where it's stability is at.
tonyyarusso
Posts: 1128
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 12:38 pm
Location: St. Paul, MN, USA
Contact:

Re: Static Linux Agent vs compile scripts

Post by tonyyarusso »

Actually, the person who built the static agent (and the only one who understood what it did) no longer works here, so at the very least it's unlikely to be updated, and we'd be at a bit of a loss for supporting it. You can certainly give it a shot, at last we checked it worked, but it doesn't get anywhere near the attention that the others do.
Tony Yarusso
Technical Services
___
TIES
Web: http://ties.k12.mn.us/
Locked