Redundancy or load balancing on log server

This support forum board is for support questions relating to Nagios Log Server, our solution for managing and monitoring critical log data.
gormank
Posts: 1114
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 12:00 pm

Re: Redundancy or load balancing on log server

Post by gormank »

Sounds goo. I'm pretty sure there are port checks in use here from F5 to hosts, so this should be workable.

Another subject from the past posts in this thread... I think on page 2, post 2 there's a statement that a 3 node cluster is better than a 2 node. My question is are odd numbers of nodes desired? I think I took the number 3 and extrapolated to odd numbers, but that may not be true...

Thanks
tmcdonald
Posts: 9117
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 8:40 am

Re: Redundancy or load balancing on log server

Post by tmcdonald »

I don't think we (sales or support) have ever recommended odd-numbered clusters over even-numbered, or vice-versa. Back on pages 2 and 3 I definitely pushed for more nodes in the cluster, in which case "3 is better than 2" would apply, but the general case was in favor of more nodes, not their divisibility by 2. Similarly, @rkennedy said "at least a 3 node cluster" which, while we may not advertise it, is available for $5,995 (the order form has more pricing options than we advertise here).
Former Nagios employee
gormank
Posts: 1114
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 12:00 pm

Re: Redundancy or load balancing on log server

Post by gormank »

Right. My mistake on the odd numbered nodes part.

Better close this quick before I ask something else... :)
Locked