Dear Sir,
I am writing to thank you for your letter and say,
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 07:57:13AM -0600, Cook, Garry wrote:
>
> I would be interested in seeing this. Although not due to the BSD issues
> that you mention below. I have trouble getting buy-in to upgrade to the
> latest 'non-stable' version, so a 1.3 release with added patches would
> be ideal. Do you see a benefit from also adding the chained hash patch
> to speed up the CGIs?
>
thank you very much for mentioning this.
Yes, this is in my view is a good win without much cost.
I am using the (glib based ?) patch for Nag 1.x and am pleased with the
CGI acceleration it provides.
However, the patch as published is incomplete and needs reworking before
it enters a release branch. For example, the restart function (HUP
signal) no longer works; my Nag needs to be stopped and started after a
config change.
>
> Garry W. Cook, CCNA
> Network Infrastructure Manager
> MACTEC, Inc. - http://www.mactec.com/
> 303.308.6228 (Office) - 720.220.1862 (Mobile)
Yours sincerely.
--
Stanley Hopcroft
Network specialist, IT Infrastructure
IP Australia
Ph: (02) 6283 3189 Fax: (02) 6281 1353
PO Box 200 Woden ACT 2606
http://www.ipaustralia.gov.au
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]