> Ethan Galstad schrieb am 11.08.2009
> 18:53:06:
>
>> Index: nagios.c
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /cvsroot/nagios/nagios/base/nagios.c,v
>> retrieving revision 1.172
>> retrieving revision 1.173
>> diff -C2 -d -r1.172 -r1.173
>> *** nagios.c 31 Jul 2009 16:54:20 -0000 1.172
>> --- nagios.c 11 Aug 2009 16:53:04 -0000 1.173
>> ***************
>> *** 607,610 ****
>> --- 607,625 ----
>> }
>>
>> + #undef TEST_TIMEPERIODS
>> + #ifdef TEST_TIMEPERIODS
>> + /* DO SOME TIMEPERIOD TESTING - ADDED 08/11/2009 */
>> + time_t now, pref_time, valid_time;
>> + timeperiod *tp;
>> + tp=find_timeperiod("247_exclusion");
>> + time(&now);
>> + pref_time=now;
>> + get_next_valid_time(pref_time,&valid_time,tp);
>> + printf("=====\n");
>> + printf("CURRENT: %lu = %s",(unsigned long)now,ctime(&now));
>> + printf("PREFERRED: %lu = %s",(unsigned long)pref_time,ctime
>> (&pref_time));
>> + printf("NEXT: %lu = %s",(unsigned long)valid_time,ctime
>> (&valid_time));
>> + printf("=====\n");
>> + #endif
>
> Hi Ethan!
>
> Am I totally blind or is this just a little bit weired code?
> If you #undef TEST_TIMEPERIODS, there is no real sense in doing an
> #ifdef TEST_TIMEPERIODS on the next line, or is there?
> The compiler will optimize it out anyways.
>
> Or is my C-foo blinded by the fact it's 9am and I didn't have my
> second coffee yet?
>
> Regards
> Sascha
Good catch for only one coffee.
Its actually some internaldebugging code I added that intentionally gets left out of the compiled
version.
- Ethan Galstad
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]