Awesome going, it looks like the proposed names for the server and
client packages are the same as what I have, which saves me a heap of
trouble when I can start tracking EPEL packages directly in my local
repo.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]=20
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf=20
> Of Michael Thomas
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 7:22 PM
> To: Nagios Developers List
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-devel] minor nsca license nit
>=20
> Hi Jeff,
>=20
> Goldschrafe, Jeffrey wrote:
> > I built annsca/nsca-client package for Fedora/CentOS for my=20
> > institution from a few weeks ago that I never got around to=20
> > submitting. Might I see what you've got, so my environment=20
> doesn't get=20
> > too out of line with what's eventually making it into Fedora?
>=20
> The latest iteration can be found at:
>=20
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D433547
>=20
> Once accepted into Fedora, I plan to add it to the EPEL=20
> repository as well so that it's available for RHEL/CentOS/SL systems.
>=20
> Regards,
>=20
> --Wart
>=20
> > Jeff Goldschrafe
> > Systems Engineer
> > Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
> > 1 Bungtown Road
> > Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724
> > (516) 367-6966
> > http://www.cshl.edu
> >=20
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [email protected]
> >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of=20
> >> Michael Thomas
> >> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 7:13 PM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: [Nagios-devel] minor nsca license nit
> >>
> >> I'm preparing a package for nsca for distribution with Fedora, and=20
> >> ran into a small nit with respect to the license.
> >> Fedora is getting pretty picky about having accurate licensing=20
> >> information for packages, so I was hoping that someone here could=20
> >> clear this up.
> >>
> >> All of the *.c and *.h sourcce files for nsca claim to be valid for
> >> GPLv2 and later, except for nsca.c and send_nsca.c which=20
> simply say:
> >> * License: GPL v2
> >> That is, these two files omit the 'or (at your option) any later=20
> >> version' clause.
> >>
> >> Is the intended license for nsca 'GPLv2 only', or 'GPLv2=20
> or later'? =20
> >> Are there any upcoming releases planned that might be able=20
> to include=20
> >> this clarification?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> --Wart
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------------------------------
> >> -----------
> >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges.=20
> >> Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Nagios-devel mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/lis ... gios-devel
> >>
> >=20
> >=20
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all=20
> challenges.=20
> > Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nagios-devel mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/lis ... gios-devel
>=20
>=20
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all=20
> challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Nagios-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/lis ... gios-devel
>=20
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]