[Nagios-devel] The nagios community wants to keep its open soul

Support forum for Nagios Core, Nagios Plugins, NCPA, NRPE, NSCA, NDOUtils and more. Engage with the community of users including those using the open source solutions.
Locked
Guest

[Nagios-devel] The nagios community wants to keep its open soul

Post by Guest »



It's an alarm call that is raised : after a long period where people =20
began to think
nagios is a dead foss project, we nearly reach a point of no return : =20
the author try to
gag on the community because it's to free!!

Let's get back to the facts : Nagios is still the reference in the =20
open source monitoring
tools, and some serious challengers like Zabbix or Zenoss try to reach =20
its place. In the
open source world, and especially the monitoring one, the real =20
strength is not in code
lines, but in the community around the project. You know the Nagios =20
one has been a great
one during years. Meanwhile, since two years, the lack of presence and =20
answer from Ethan
to proposals from the community legitimately irritate the community. =20
As much as a fork,
named Icinga, arisen a year ago.

Where the story became complex is when we look at the economic sphere =20
around Nagios. Like
a lot of foss that grow a lot, and after have given more than 8 years =20
of it's time to
Nagios, he legitimately create a support enterprise behind it, "Nagios =20
Enterprise". The
Icinga fork came from community members that are also employees of =20
another society that
supports Nagios : Netways. If the GPLv2 license of Nagios was =20
respected, it seems more
like a business fork than a foss one for the nagios author. That had =20
irritate Nagios
author and the major part of the community have stay in the Nagios project.

Unfortunately, this story have a side effect : we are thinking Ethan =20
began to turn
against the community, and this open spirit that allow this fork, by =20
ignore even more the
community and refuse to answer to code enhancement proposals.
Last but not least affront : he ask the DNS entry of the French nagios =20
community site
(http://www.nagios-fr.org) to be give to him so he can raised a new =20
community, more
corporate : in this site we can see some posts about the felon (but =20
open source and
nagios relative) Icinga project! This fork seem to have finally more =20
cut Ethan author and
the community than the community into two parts.

That's the last straw for a community who want to be as free as foss =20
it supports. In Open
Source, we have "free as in beer" but also "free as in speech". I, as =20
the leader of the
French community, and with the support of community members, answer =20
him that it will be
be tolerated to be dictate laws about what the community can speak =20
about. To do not risk
an hypothetical sue from Nagios Enterprise (for trademark protection), =20
we have decided to
migrate the site to monitoring-fr.org and to gave the nagios-fr.org =20
site to Nagios
enterprise when the migration will be finished.

With this open letter entitle "The nagios community wants to keep its =20
open soul", the
community ask where the project is going and if it will still be open =20
and ethically
respectful of the open source spirit. Some question raised about the =20
real open aspect of
the Nagios future by freezing the current open source part and put it =20
into a close
solution (Nagios XI, close application based on Nagios, soon available =20
from Nagios
Enterprise) that seem to be the only part that will evolve in the =20
future. The community
also ask how it's seen in the Nagios project, if it still have is its =20
place into it and
if it must hold its tongue about what is not "corporate" for Nagios =20
Enterprise.

The community want to help on the industrialization and support of =20
Nagios by free
software business, but still want to keep its soul. The community wish =20
Nagios keep it's
first rank, that was give to it by the community, and the project came =20
back to "the old
good time" when foss developers and people who just want to help had =20
yet their words to
say against marketing communication.

We wish this open letter will not be a dead letter, because this will =20
finish to dig the
gap between the author and its community, that represent a major part =20
of the project's
power, and will not finish by a fork that will divided again the =20
community, and will add
another ta

...[email truncated]...


This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]
Locked