Thomas Mitchell wrote:
> excuse me. but isnt OP5 is doing the same.
Nopes. We're selling a packaged solution based on opensource. The fact
that it *is* opensource is actually a salespitch, because customers
don't have to worry about company continuity.
Besides that, I've submitted some 30-odd patches back to nagios (core
project, don't get me started on the plugins) for bugfixes, new features
and what not, and I'm always keen on beta-testing new stuff so that it
can go stable as soon as possible.
Sakersoft ripped it, modified it and gave nothing back.
> distributing nagios / cacti / ntop without mentioning the open source.
> i dont think what saker soft doing is right especially using the nagios name.
It's not. It's against copyright law, and Ethan can sue their pants off.
> selling proffesional services around open source products are acceptable,
> as long as you mention the origin.
>
My thoughts exactly. Glad we agree.
--
Andreas Ericsson [email protected]
OP5 AB www.op5.se
Lead Developer
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]