> I fully agree with you, but could you please call it a name that
> wouldn't cause confusion?
Any proposals?
> If you insist on using NSCA2, please implement a compatibility layer
What type of compatibility would people want?
Protocol compatibility? (that is that you can mix nsca2 and nsca clients
and servers)
- this one I'm not aiming for.
Configuration compatibility?
- Didn't have it in mind. Maybe if the community wants it, the
community gets it
Interface compatibility? (you subsitute clients and server, and
everything keeps on working, that is: nagios doesn't have to be
reconfigured to update to nsca2)
- I'm aiming for type of compatibility
Anything I didn't think of?
Cheers,
Jose Luis Martinez
[email protected]
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]