Wayne Mery wrote:
> On 10/21/2004 1:34 PM, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
>
>> Wayne Mery wrote:
>>
>>> Gee, what a hornets nest. Who'da thought Ethan would be so
>>> Territorial, with a big T. I thought all the comments were
>>> supportive. I know mine were.
>>>
>>> Certainly some sensitivity and frustration in his response. From the
>>> user's viewpoint I'm not sure he's taking a very balanced perspective
>>> - example Nag1.2 tarball is dated Feb 2004 - but then I guess he
>>> doesn't have to, he's the owner and doesn't want partners.
>>>
>>> Unfortuately the present 'patch system' via email doesn't lend itself
>>> to tracking/management like one might get with bugzilla or
>>> sourceforge. It really would be nice if there were a more formal bug
>>> and patch system. Am I missing something?
>>>
>>
>> Perhaps something like this;
>> http://oss.op5.se/mantis
>>
>> It works with https as well.
>>
> Looks OK. Active product which is good.
> Advantages over bugzilla? Or simply setting up a patch project on
> sourceforge?
>
I haven't worked that much with bugzilla, but it's way better than
what's available at sourceforge.
Check out www.mantisbt.org or raxnet.net (click your way through) for a
live demo that's in active use.
--
Andreas Ericsson [email protected]
OP5 AB www.op5.se
Lead Developer
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]