Re: [Nagios-devel] Feedback on Nagios

Support forum for Nagios Core, Nagios Plugins, NCPA, NRPE, NSCA, NDOUtils and more. Engage with the community of users including those using the open source solutions.
Locked
Guest

Re: [Nagios-devel] Feedback on Nagios

Post by Guest »

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> Now this isn't a major problem for us - I wrote discovery scripts in
> perl that given a list of
Would you be interested in sharing this script?

> Currently with the first sweep of discovery (excluding networking type
> queries) we ended up with around
> 300 hosts and 1500 services with checking of services every 5 minutes.
> This absolutely hammered CPU of the
> box it was on (Sun E250 Dual CPU and 2Gb Memory). This was okay, we
> used the embedded perl option
> and this got us to just under 100% utilisation. Yes this is an issue
> with the plugins and I'll discuss this later.
Perl really isn't a great idea for plugins that get executed frequently;
it's just too large of a process. I've head that using perlcc improves
matters as well.

> tool for further processing.
> such as counters. Admittedly we run this at maximum nice levels to
> ensure it does not impact primary
> data collection work.
You might consider splitting the graphing mechanism off to a different
machine to lighten the load on the collector.

> ** Nagios does not natively deal with counters - not really a Nagios
> problem, just an observation. i.e. write your
I believe one of the selling points of Nagios is that it is completely
plugin agnostic -- it cares not what you are monitoring. Going down the
path of making it understand what certain plugins are doing would probably
greatly increase complexity and reduce stability.

> This is a real concern as NNM can do this without even breaking a sweat
> - admittedly it does not have the dependency type
> information included.
I think a more accurate comparison would be if you left out the dependency
information when taking the timings.

> I have seen patches to improve performance on this (have not yet
> implemented/tested) and I think this is improved on the next
> version.
The docs indicate that Nagios will create a 'compiled' config file for the
CGI's to read that will be less expensive.

> ** I am not sure that active checks scale at all well under Nagios.
You can also use distributed monitoring if you've maxed out your active
check capacity on a given machine.

- -Jason Martin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.3.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: pgpenvelope 2.10.2 - http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net/

iD8DBQE/22obl2ODWuqVSBMRAg6hAJ4ixWzn5pWUqcul2Kg2Y/FtFX87KgCfXb+z
WJ/VY/95b6gCfOVXX315lRo=
=kwM1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]
Locked