On 13. aug.. 2009, at 22.00, Holger Wei=DF wrote:
> * Badri Pillai [2009-08-13 15:00]:
>> BUT a security bug, which is not only affecting Nagios
>> but the whole system it is running on,
>> needs special attention and should be fixed asap
>>
>> ON all versions of Nagios provides for download (as patch)
>
> Support for old release branches is what your Unix or Linux =20
> distribution
> vendor should provide, not necessarily the upstream developers.
That is bullshit. Why won't you add that fix to the 3.[01].x? Is it =20
really that much work?
Seems to me the only reason not to do so, is to force people to use =20
3.2.x instead of the old versions.
I can understand quite well that someone chose to fork out =20
Icinga........
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
[email protected]
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres =20
intelligibelt. Det er et element=E6rt imperativ for alle pedagoger =E5 =20=
unng=E5 eksessiv anvendelse av idiomer med fremmed opprinnelse. I de =20
fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate og relevante synonymer p=E5 norsk.
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]