Re: [Nagios-devel] fix request

[Guest]

On Aug 14, 2009, at 3:27 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:

> On 13. aug.. 2009, at 22.00, Holger Wei=DF wrote:

> That is bullshit. Why won't you add that fix to the 3.[01].x? Is it
> really that much work?

You know that Holger has no say in whether that happens or not, right?

> Seems to me the only reason not to do so, is to force people to use
> 3.2.x instead of the old versions.

Your animosity on this issue is spectacular considering the patch you =20=

seek is available via Sourceforge (took me less than 5 minutes to find =20=

in the CVS tree). Isn't that why you're using Open Source software =20
instead of commercial software? So you're not _forced_ to upgrade and =20=

can instead continue to maintain old code yourself?

And yes, using the latest stable release is a good thing and should be =20=

encouraged.

You keep bringing up Icinga. If you like Icinga, and their methods, =20
_use_ Icinga! Nobody here has a stake in which of the two you use. =20
Choose the one that's best for you. It's really that simple.

--
Marc






This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]