------=_Part_20915_16435594.1201251776857
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On Jan 25, 2008 12:06 AM, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> Mark Eisenblaetter wrote:
> > On Jan 16, 2008 10:38 AM, Mark Eisenblaetter [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Jan 16, 2008 10:07 AM, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> >>
> >>> Please don't top-post. It makes it hard to follow the discussion,
> >>> especially when you're top-posting to an answer that wasn't top-
> >>> posted. Anyways...
> >>>
> >>> Mark Eisenblaetter wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>> sorry for the latye replay,
> >>>>
> >>>> Then I will have to much templates, because i will need for every
> >>>> kombination of args a new template.
> >>>>
> >>>> For example by check_http I will need a template vor every
> >>> website/service i
> >>>> want to check or for every disk with diffrend warning and Critival
> >>>> threshosld.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thats not so practicable.
> >>>>
> >>> Originally you wrote:
> >>>>>> so it would be great if i can say in the template use the
> >>> check_command
> >>>>>> (check_dummy) defined in the template and not that defined in the
> >>> Host.
> >>> To which I replied:
> >>>>> That's what not setting anything in the object itself is for. If you
> >>> don't
> >>>>> have a check_command in the host object, it will use the one from
> the
> >>>>> template.
> >>>>>
> >>> In other words, if you want a particular object to inherit the value
> >>> from
> >>> the template, simply don't set that value in the object. There was no
> >>> other question-like statement in your original mail.
> >>>
> >> Ok, then my first mail was not so clear I hoped.
> >>
> >> I was thinking of that as a new feature, to minimize the templatework.
> >>
> >>
> > Ok it seems that i am the only one that would like this feature.
> >
> > Or do i miss one way to handle that situation without having a template
> for
> > nearly every check?
> >
>
> You still have not clarified your original email. Only discovered that
> it's
> not clear enough. If you can manage that, I'm sure there's already a
> solution
> in Nagios for you.
>
> --
> Andreas Ericsson [email protected]
> OP5 AB www.op5.se
> Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Nagios-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/lis ... gios-devel
>
Hi Andreas,
i know that if i don't define an command in the f.e. service definition that
nagios will use the on in the template.
I started to generate a service definition und two templates one for the
master and one for the slave.
Here are an exaple:
define service{
use
freschness-20min,GL-Tcoder-Active-Service,pnp
host_name gl-tcoder-sw
servicegroups interface
service_description Port1
check_command check_mb_snmp_int!1
}
Master Template, template pnp and freschness is only to set the
checkfreschness and extinfo on the Master server and on the slave they are
empty
define service{
register 0
name GL-Tcoder-Active-Service
active_checks_enabled 0
check_period 24x7
max_check_attempts 3
normal_check_interval 5
retry_check_interval 1
passive_checks_enabled 1
obsess_over_service 0
check_freshness 0
event_handler_enabled 0
notifications_enabled 1
notification_interval 120
notification_period 24x7
notification_options w,u,c,r,f
contact_groups rss,streaming
}
Slave Template
define service{
register
...[email truncated]...
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]