> On 09/21/2012 02:32 PM, Leo Baltus wrote:
> > Op 02/04/2012 om 11:10:09 +0200, schreef Leo Baltus:
> >> Attached patch fixes a small memory leak introduced by my IPv6 patch I
> >> sent earlier, see below.
> >>
> >> As I haven't got any reponse on my first post so I'll just resubmit the
> >> complete patch.
> >>
> >
> > Can somebody comment on my 2 patches I sent april 2nd?
> >
>
> I'm not the NRPE maintainer, but for what it's worth, I like them.
>
Buts who is? And how can we persuade him/her to join this discussion?
> > It would be really nice if it could get merged before Nagios4 is
> > released.
> >
>
> While I tentatively agree with that, there's no real reason to take
> patches to NRPE before Nagios 4, as the two have no code dependencies
> between them.
>
> > If there is some work to be done on it, I might have some spare time do
> > that, but please let me know what should be done.
> >
>
> On Nagios 4? Testing would be helpful. If you're in an asskicking
> mood, you could go ahead and add an "accept new worker" handler
> for the query-handler so external programs can register with Nagios
> and request to run certain plugins.
>
> check_nrpe would be one of the prime candidates for such persistent
> workers, along with a generic do-all "check interface things over
> snmp" thing. Don't go and write a ton of code for that snmp interface
> thing though. I've got 99% of that done already
>
--
Leo Baltus, internetbeheerder /\
NPO ICT Internet Services /NPO/\
Sumatralaan 45, 1217 GP Hilversum, Filmcentrum, west \ /\/
[email protected], 035-6773555 \/
This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]