Re: [Nagios-devel] HOSTGROUPNAME macro not filled completely

Support forum for Nagios Core, Nagios Plugins, NCPA, NRPE, NSCA, NDOUtils and more. Engage with the community of users including those using the open source solutions.
Locked
Guest

Re: [Nagios-devel] HOSTGROUPNAME macro not filled completely

Post by Guest »

------=_Part_11848_9436953.1196348849927
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi,

i'm not sure but i think i remember the discussion where ethan say that he
will genarete the new macro for 3 but will not change 2.

mark

On Nov 29, 2007 3:58 PM, Michael Streb wrote:

> Hi J=F6rg,
>
> thanks for that hint (but i got that before :) ), in my case the
> installation is based on 2.x.
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael
>
>
> Am 29.11.2007 15:55 Uhr schrieb "Joerg Linge" unter >:
>
> > Am Donnerstag, 29. November 2007 15:49 schrieb Michael Streb:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> today i discovered (in my opinion) a bug with the $HOSTGROUPNAME$
> macro.
> >>
> >> The macro is filled with only one hostgroup, so if the host belongs to
> more
> >> than one hostgroups the information is lost.
> >>
> >> Is there any reason why this is coded like this ?
> >
> > Hi Michael
> >
> > In Nagios 3.x the macro name is $HOSTGROUPNAMES$
> > http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/3_0/ ... groupnames
> >
> > J=F6rg
> >
> >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
> > from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
> > mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future.
> > http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nagios-devel mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/lis ... gios-devel
>
> --
> Michael Streb
> Senior Consultant
>
> NETWAYS GmbH | Deutschherrnstr. 47a | D-90429 N=FCrnberg
> Tel: +49 911 92885-0 | Fax: +49 911 92885-77
> GF: Julian Hein | AG N=FCrnberg HRB18461
>
> http://www.netways.de | [email protected]
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
> from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
> mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future.
> http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
> _______________________________________________
> Nagios-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/lis ... gios-devel
>



--=20
Mark Eisenbl=E4tter
Geissendoerfer & Leschinsky GmbH
www.gl-sytemhaus.de

------=_Part_11848_9436953.1196348849927
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi,i'm not sure but i think i remember the discussion where eth=
an say that he will genarete the new macro for 3 but will not change 2.=
markOn Nov 29, 2007 3:58 PM, Michael=
Streb <
[email protected]> wrote:Hi J=F6rg,t=
hanks for that hint (but i got that before :) ), in my case the
installation is based on 2.x.Regards,MichaelAm 29.11.2007 15:55 Uhr schrieb "Joerg Linge" unter <[email protected]>:
> Am Donnerstag, 29. November 2007 15:49=
schrieb Michael Streb:>> Hi,>>>> today i dis=
covered (in my opinion) a bug with the $HOSTGROUPNAME$ macro.>>
>> The macro is filled with only one hostgroup, so if the host be=
longs to more>> than one hostgroups the information is lost.&=
gt;>>> Is there any reason why this is coded like this ?
>> Hi Michael>> In Nagios 3.x the macro name is $HO=
STGROUPNAMES$> http://nagios.sourceforge.net=
/docs/3_0/m

...[email truncated]...


This post was automatically imported from historical nagios-devel mailing list archives
Original poster: [email protected]
Locked